12 Jul '07 17:24>
you'd be surprised, but I've had good success with the Sicillian Najdorf against 1.e4 and I think I'll try the snake as previously mentioned against 1.d4 🙂
Originally posted by Player163829531I thought that was the orangutang... The polish I know goes 1.d4 b5!? I know spassky has played it occasionally.
I've seen interesting games caused from 1.b2-b4 (Polish).Bobby Fischer played it once.I wish he played it more often.It's not my style of an opening though.
Originally posted by bikingviking1. b4 is known as the Polish Opening (and other names too) whereas 1. d4 b5 is the Polish Defence.
I thought that was the orangutang... The polish I know goes 1.d4 b5!? I know spassky has played it occasionally.
Speaking of the Kings gambit, I still remember the first time I met KG in OTB (long time ago). Since my openingknowledge was very limited I played (me as black) 1.e4 e5 2.f4 f6?? (suicide move no1). Can you figure out how white is winning i ...[text shortened]... upset since my opponent was rated nearly 500 elo more. That is the kind of games you remember.
Originally posted by Sam The ShamThere was an engine (I think Crafty) on one of the chess servers years ago that played the Halloween Gambit every game. I played about twenty games with it and had pretty good results, scoring about 50%. The Gambit is definitely worth a shot at our level.
Halloween gambit. Looks awful, but hard to figure out once you get going.
Originally posted by diskamylThe fact that you don't know how to play it doesn't make it a bad opening.
Hammerschlag really, really disgusts me 🙂. I can't even stand analysing it.
there are 1.d3 or 1.e3, which could transpose into a sound opening but still has the effect of a surprise.
Originally posted by Fat LadyYes it was crafty that had a Halloween Gambit only opening book for the internet as an experiment, it's mentioned here:
There was an engine (I think Crafty) on one of the chess servers years ago that played the Halloween Gambit every game. I played about twenty games with it and had pretty good results, scoring about 50%. The Gambit is definitely worth a shot at our level.
Originally posted by Sam The ShamOf course - Brause - how could I forget that name? It's scary that my games against Brause must have taken place ten years ago. I chatted to the controller of Brause quite a bit once he noticed I kept on coming back for more games. I liked the idea of playing someone 300 points higher than me with what was basically piece odds. I found a database of Brause's games from 1996 to 1998 and I'm going to see if I can find any of mine to remind myself what a great player I was then.
Yes it was crafty that had a Halloween Gambit only opening book for the internet as an experiment, it's mentioned here:
http://www.chessville.com/UCO/Halloween_Gambit/Part_1.htm
It's a good read on this interesting opening.
Originally posted by Fat LadyA Russian GM, whose name I forget (there are so many!), has brought out a book on the variation (1.e4 c5 2.a3), so I suppose it can't be too bad. I think the idea is to play for b4 and get Wing Gambit type positions which may be improvements on the originals.
The Wing Gambit isn't seen that often in OTB play - 1.e4 c5 2.b4.
A friend of mine plays a strange variation - 1.e4 c5 2.a3 and gets positions which are almost playable some of the time.