Go back
bishops vs knights

bishops vs knights

Only Chess

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Redmike
Chess is really not that simple a game.

You cannot have general rules about whether bishops are better than knights or vice versa.

It depends on the dynamics and the structure of the position.

Sometimes a bishop is better than a rook, or a knight might even be better than a queen.
General rules are to help players avoid making common mistakes. Of course a stronger player knows when to break the rules when the position calls for it. I see no problem with having general rules.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by TRAINS44
Hmmmmmmm....wwjsd?
What would Jeremy Silman Do?

I started off on this site preffering knights, but I got demolished quite a few times by the bishop pair, so I decided to try to keep my bishop pair as much as possible. I'm still learning, but it does seem that the bishops are better, except maybe when playing a lower rated player who may not see the 1 or 2 move knight forks.

D

Vote Up
Vote Down

http://www.redhotpawn.com/board/showthread.php?threadid=32066

Vote Up
Vote Down

Oops, wrong thread.

Vote Up
Vote Down

In the end game knight would be a much better choice if the opponent has rook and bishop.

Vote Up
Vote Down

I prefer Bishops in most cases, but recently played a game in which my opponent traded both his bishops for both my Knights, then using this 'Knight pair' demolished me. There is also a Lasker-Chigorin game where Chigorin uses both Knights to completely dominate Lasker's Bishops.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Thread 60766

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

"Bishop versus Knight: The Verdict" by Steve Mayer, 1997
International Chess Enterprises (American Batsford Chess
Library), Figurine Algebraic Notation, paperback, 224pp., $22.50

Reviewed by Glenn Budzinski

http://www.chesscafe.com/text/bvkt.txt


Reviewed by Hoa H

http://www.amazon.com/gp/cdp/member-reviews/AGYN68JA8L7PB?ie=UTF8&sort_by=MostRecentReview

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Ragnorak
What would Jeremy Silman Do?

I started off on this site preffering knights, but I got demolished quite a few times by the bishop pair, so I decided to try to keep my bishop pair as much as possible. I'm still learning, but it does seem that the bishops are better, except maybe when playing a lower rated player who may not see the 1 or 2 move knight forks.

D
I change my mind. They're about equal, and the relative superiority of the minor pieces depends wholly on the position.

Is the bishop good or bad? Does the knight have safe advanced outposts? Is the position open or closed? Can I open or close the position to suit my pieces to the detriment of my opponents pieces?

D

Vote Up
Vote Down

I think Bobby Fischer liked his Bishops. Didn't he say they were four pawns at one point?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by mrjonesvich321
I think Bobby Fischer liked his Bishops. Didn't he say they were four pawns at one point?
He said they were 3.25 points 🙄

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by mrjonesvich321
I think Bobby Fischer liked his Bishops. Didn't he say they were four pawns at one point?
In a bunch of games I've seen of his, he'll trade a rook for a bishop.

Vote Up
Vote Down

I know you can mate with two bishops but can you mate with two knights?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Wulebgr
I think the knight is better here:

[fen]6n1/3k1N2/b3p2p/3pP1pP/2pP2K1/1pN3P1/1P6/8 w - - 0 43[/fen]

White's move
It looks like pawns are best of all as 1. Nxh6 Nxh6+ 2. Kxg5 is tempting here.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by deeploser
I know you can mate with two bishops but can you mate with two knights?
In general not, there is one position that you can mate from:



all other positions that aren't rotations or reflections of this are drawn.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.