Go back
Blackmar Gambit

Blackmar Gambit

Only Chess

moon1969

Houston, Texas

Joined
28 Sep 10
Moves
14347
Clock
23 Mar 12
7 edits

Blackmar-Diemer Gambit. A RHP Nov 2010 game against who I think is a strong opponent. I am black.

moon1969

Houston, Texas

Joined
28 Sep 10
Moves
14347
Clock
23 Mar 12
3 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

Another RHP game against the same opponent. I am white and resigned early suffering a pseudo-smother mate.

1.e4 c5
2.Nf3 d6
3.Bb5

c

USA

Joined
22 Dec 05
Moves
13780
Clock
23 Mar 12
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

In the first game, the bishops of opposite color endgame should've been a draw. Even after White sacrificed the bishop, he had a draw until the horrific blunder 50.a5. Kc4 forces a draw, since there's no way to prevent 51.Kb5 and 52. a5

To prevent this, 49...Kd5 should give Black the win.

G

Stockholm, Sweden

Joined
31 Jan 06
Moves
3059
Clock
24 Mar 12
Vote Up
Vote Down

I don't understand why people the Blackmar Diemer gambit. It is a totally useless hack 🙂 Must be one of the few things that ever held back talent so much as skilled people insisting on playing this opening.

moon1969

Houston, Texas

Joined
28 Sep 10
Moves
14347
Clock
24 Mar 12
3 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Golub
I don't understand why people the Blackmar Diemer gambit. It is a totally useless hack 🙂 Must be one of the few things that ever held back talent so much as skilled people insisting on playing this opening.
When I researched it, the Blackmar Diemer gambit definitely has a strong fringe following, like many questionable openings, and they believed it the best thing since sliced bread. I can see how the Blackmar Diemer gambit could be interesting for white in blitz play, and even in OTB play where their black opponent is unfamiliar and gets into trouble.

My opponent in the game above who played the BD gambit, and who has become a RHP friend and is a leader of one of my clans, is not a big fan of the gambit and thought it unsound. He commented that he played it against me because he had just recently come out of a BD thematic tournament, and was merely trying it out. Firmian of the MCO states regarding the Blackmar-Diemer Gambit:
White immediately opens lines for his attack, wiping away any threats that the game will take on a slow, strategic, boring nature. The only problem is that the Blackmar-Diemer is not particularly good, so most players will wish to use it only in blitz games.

moon1969

Houston, Texas

Joined
28 Sep 10
Moves
14347
Clock
24 Mar 12
2 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

For those of you familiar with this gambit, what are a couple of key considerations for black to refute the gambit?

Typical, White pushes f3 offering this as the gambit pawn. As black, I want to accept exf3, and then know how to refute the accepted gambit. Black to move.

moon1969

Houston, Texas

Joined
28 Sep 10
Moves
14347
Clock
24 Mar 12
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by chesskid001
In the first game, the bishops of opposite color endgame should've been a draw. Even after White sacrificed the bishop, he had a draw until the horrific blunder 50.a5. Kc4 forces a draw, since there's no way to prevent 51.Kb5 and 52. a5

To prevent this, 49...Kd5 should give Black the win.
You are right. That is a draw. What a gift he white gave me moving a5 instead of Kc4. Position below is a draw. Black to move.

h
peacedog's keeper

Joined
15 Jan 11
Moves
13975
Clock
24 Mar 12
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by moon1969
For those of you familiar with this gambit, what are a couple of key considerations for black to refute the gambit?

Typical, White pushes f3 offering this as the gambit pawn. As black, I want to accept exf3, and then know how to refute the accepted gambit. Black to move.

[fen]rnbqkb1r/ppp1pppp/5n2/8/3Pp3/2N2P2/PPP3PP/R1BQKBNR b KQkq - 0 4[/fen]
Well the e5 move puts you in endgame mode strate away. Not what a gambitter wants, I guess.

Richard Laura

Joined
15 Mar 10
Moves
50353
Clock
24 Mar 12
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by moon1969
You are right. That is a draw. What a gift he white gave me moving a5 instead of Kc4. Position below is a draw. Black to move.

[fen]8/8/1p1b4/4k3/PPK5/8/8/8 w - - 5 50[/fen]
As the player of the White pieces in the cited game, I wish I could recall what I was thinking when I played a5 instead of Kc4. It was certainly a terrible blunder.

moon1969

Houston, Texas

Joined
28 Sep 10
Moves
14347
Clock
24 Mar 12
5 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Richard Laura
As the player of the White pieces in the cited game, I wish I could recall what I was thinking when I played a5 instead of Kc4. It was certainly a terrible blunder.
Richard it makes my win a little less satisfying. You earned that draw, and then just missed it at the end. I didn't even notice it until it was just pointed out. I vaguely remember thinking incorrectly in the game that my K would have position as our Ks were moving across the board at the end. But it was only your a5 move which allowed me to push my b-pawn to help secure the position.

The intitial position after your bishop sac for my two passed connected pawns on the king-side. As black, I thoight I could then get my K over in time but evidently not. White to move.




After moving our kings over a couple of moves, I did Bd6. Not sure why, but I am sure I had a reason. In the position below, maybe I should have done 49 . . . Kd5 instead of the 49 . . . Bd6 which I did. Does black Kd5 win below for black? Black to move.



Edit: chesskid above points out Kd5 is a win for black, and thus black Bd6 offers the draw to white.

moon1969

Houston, Texas

Joined
28 Sep 10
Moves
14347
Clock
24 Mar 12
Vote Up
Vote Down

Still wondering what are key actions for black to refute the Blackmar-Diemer gambit. Black to move.

moon1969

Houston, Texas

Joined
28 Sep 10
Moves
14347
Clock
24 Mar 12
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by chesskid001
To prevent this, 49...Kd5 should give Black the win.
I just see the answer to my question about Kd5, you had already stated it before I ask it. I am not sure why as black I did 49 . . Bd6 instead of the 49 . . . Kd5.

h
Hopeless romantic

The sticks

Joined
01 Oct 06
Moves
41291
Clock
24 Mar 12
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by moon1969
Still wondering what are key actions for black to refute the Blackmar-Diemer gambit. Black to move.
There aren't any. It's completely winning.

Just kidding.

I play the BDG as white but when I play against it I refuse the gambit with e3. e6 as black is usually a pretty solid follow up move if you want to accept the gambit.

moon1969

Houston, Texas

Joined
28 Sep 10
Moves
14347
Clock
25 Mar 12
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by hunterknox
There aren't any. It's completely winning.

Just kidding.

I play the BDG as white but when I play against it I refuse the gambit with e3. e6 as black is usually a pretty solid follow up move if you want to accept the gambit.
Firmian of the MCO says declining is a safe route for black, and with the main declining variation of black e6 "is safe, leaving white just faintly better."

However, I do like to accept a gambit in most cases, and then refute it and win with the extra pawn (or maybe sometimes giving back the pawn to get a superior position). It is just gratifying to accept a gambit and win.

c

USA

Joined
22 Dec 05
Moves
13780
Clock
27 Mar 12
Vote Up
Vote Down

I recall reading a book on the Scandinavian (which can transpose to the BDG via 1.e4 d5 2.d4) where the author recommended 1.e4 d5 2.d4 dxe4 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.f3 exf3 5.Nxf3 c6 as the most solid route for black.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.