23 Mar '12 10:40>7 edits
Blackmar-Diemer Gambit. A RHP Nov 2010 game against who I think is a strong opponent. I am black.
EVENT | November 2010 Mini Banded Octet I 1850-1900 |
SITE | http://www.redhotpawn.com |
DATE | 2010.12.03 |
ROUND | 1 |
WHITE | Richard Laura |
BLACK | moon1969 |
RESULT | 0-1 |
WHITEELO | 1941 |
BLACKELO | 2135 |
[Event "November 2010 Mini Banded Octet I 1850-1900"]
[Site "http://www.redhotpawn.com"]
[Date "2010.12.03"]
[EndDate "2011.01.18"]
[Round "1"]
[White "Richard Laura"]
[Black "moon1969"]
[WhiteRating "1941"]
[BlackRating "2135"]
[WhiteElo "1941"]
[BlackElo "2135"]
[Result "0-1"]
[GameId "7980779"]
1. d4 d5 2. e4 {I think this is the Blackmar Gambit, which I read was refutable with careful play, and I thought as Black I could careful play and follow book in CC.} dxe4 3. Nb1c3 Ng8f6 4. f3 exf3 5. Ng1xf3 Bc8g4 6. h3 Bg4xf3 7. Qd1xf3 c6 8. Bc1e3 e6 9. Bf1d3 Nb8d7 10. O-O Bf8e7 11. Rf1f2 O-O 12. Ra1f1 Qd8a5 {I wasn't sure how I got to this point with him White having such an ominous f-file presence and the well-positioned bishop pair. I guess that is the Blackmar-Diemer Gambit.} 13. Qf3g3 {White apparently setting up for his king-side attack.} Nf6h5 14. Qg3g4 Nd7f6 {I think out of book now. As Black, just trying to get my pieces into play on the king side, and also noting that my Q has some scope to the king-side.} 15. Qg4f3 g6 16. g4 Nh5g7 17. Qf3g3 Nf6d5 18. Nc3xd5 Qa5xd5 19. Qg3c7 {I think that Qc7 was a mistake for White and diffused the pressure he had on my Black K. Not sure what he should have done.} Qd5d6 20. Qc7xd6 Be7xd6 21. Rf2f3 Bd6c7 22. h4 Ra8d8 {My Black rook at f8 is stuck there. His White presence on the f-file with the double rooks is annoying. Yet, I am a pawn up. I like to refute a gambit and win with the pawn. Gratifying.} 23. c3 Rd8d7 24. Bd3c2 f5 {I think trying to relieve the pressure on the f7 square.} 25. gxf5 exf5 {Nice} 26. Bc2b3 Kg8h8 27. Be3h6 Rf8e8 28. Bh6xg7 Kh8xg7 29. h5 Re8e2 30. hxg6 hxg6 {Still a pawn up, and position improving. Though there is the drawish opposite color bishops. Yet my connected passed pawns on the king-side is nice.} 31. Rf3f2 Rd7e7 32. Rf2xe2 Re7xe2 33. Rf1f2 Re2xf2 34. Kg1xf2 {I am willing to trade because a pawn up, and even with the opposite color bishops on the board because I have the connected passed pawns,} Kg7f6 35. d5 cxd5 36. Bb3xd5 b6 37. Kf2f3 g5 38. a4 a5 39. b4 axb4 40. cxb4 Kf6e5 41. Bd5b7 Ke5f6 {As Black, playing it by feel here.} 42. Kf3g2 g4 43. Bb7c8 Kf6g5 44. Bc8b7 f4 45. Bb7e4 f3 46. Be4xf3 gxf3 47. Kg2xf3 Kg5f5 {I can get the K over in time, and with the opposition, and also just make sure to keep my b-pawn to avoid the draw.} 48. Kf3e3 Kf5e5 49. Ke3d3 Bc7d6 50. a5 b5 {Keeping the b-pawn. And my black K has position.} 51. a6 Bd6b8 {White resigns. Black can get the opposition and drive away the white K and get White's b-pawn, and do more.} 0-1
[Site "http://www.redhotpawn.com"]
[Date "2010.12.03"]
[EndDate "2011.01.18"]
[Round "1"]
[White "Richard Laura"]
[Black "moon1969"]
[WhiteRating "1941"]
[BlackRating "2135"]
[WhiteElo "1941"]
[BlackElo "2135"]
[Result "0-1"]
[GameId "7980779"]
1. d4 d5 2. e4 {I think this is the Blackmar Gambit, which I read was refutable with careful play, and I thought as Black I could careful play and follow book in CC.} dxe4 3. Nb1c3 Ng8f6 4. f3 exf3 5. Ng1xf3 Bc8g4 6. h3 Bg4xf3 7. Qd1xf3 c6 8. Bc1e3 e6 9. Bf1d3 Nb8d7 10. O-O Bf8e7 11. Rf1f2 O-O 12. Ra1f1 Qd8a5 {I wasn't sure how I got to this point with him White having such an ominous f-file presence and the well-positioned bishop pair. I guess that is the Blackmar-Diemer Gambit.} 13. Qf3g3 {White apparently setting up for his king-side attack.} Nf6h5 14. Qg3g4 Nd7f6 {I think out of book now. As Black, just trying to get my pieces into play on the king side, and also noting that my Q has some scope to the king-side.} 15. Qg4f3 g6 16. g4 Nh5g7 17. Qf3g3 Nf6d5 18. Nc3xd5 Qa5xd5 19. Qg3c7 {I think that Qc7 was a mistake for White and diffused the pressure he had on my Black K. Not sure what he should have done.} Qd5d6 20. Qc7xd6 Be7xd6 21. Rf2f3 Bd6c7 22. h4 Ra8d8 {My Black rook at f8 is stuck there. His White presence on the f-file with the double rooks is annoying. Yet, I am a pawn up. I like to refute a gambit and win with the pawn. Gratifying.} 23. c3 Rd8d7 24. Bd3c2 f5 {I think trying to relieve the pressure on the f7 square.} 25. gxf5 exf5 {Nice} 26. Bc2b3 Kg8h8 27. Be3h6 Rf8e8 28. Bh6xg7 Kh8xg7 29. h5 Re8e2 30. hxg6 hxg6 {Still a pawn up, and position improving. Though there is the drawish opposite color bishops. Yet my connected passed pawns on the king-side is nice.} 31. Rf3f2 Rd7e7 32. Rf2xe2 Re7xe2 33. Rf1f2 Re2xf2 34. Kg1xf2 {I am willing to trade because a pawn up, and even with the opposite color bishops on the board because I have the connected passed pawns,} Kg7f6 35. d5 cxd5 36. Bb3xd5 b6 37. Kf2f3 g5 38. a4 a5 39. b4 axb4 40. cxb4 Kf6e5 41. Bd5b7 Ke5f6 {As Black, playing it by feel here.} 42. Kf3g2 g4 43. Bb7c8 Kf6g5 44. Bc8b7 f4 45. Bb7e4 f3 46. Be4xf3 gxf3 47. Kg2xf3 Kg5f5 {I can get the K over in time, and with the opposition, and also just make sure to keep my b-pawn to avoid the draw.} 48. Kf3e3 Kf5e5 49. Ke3d3 Bc7d6 50. a5 b5 {Keeping the b-pawn. And my black K has position.} 51. a6 Bd6b8 {White resigns. Black can get the opposition and drive away the white K and get White's b-pawn, and do more.} 0-1