1. Standard memberSchlecter
    The King of Board
    Solar System
    Joined
    09 Feb '13
    Moves
    31423
    05 Mar '15 15:411 edit
    Originally posted by King Tiger
    Agree. I play on chess.com for blitz chess, not here. Wish Russ would put more effort into it (hint). I'm confident many players would make use of it.
    what is the name?????.... I play as ziro_the_gray in chess.com
    and nevergambits in lychess.org

    five min.... 0 bonus
  2. Standard memberSchlecter
    The King of Board
    Solar System
    Joined
    09 Feb '13
    Moves
    31423
    05 Mar '15 23:221 edit
    a lot of fun today. a lot of fellow players in the room....
  3. Standard memberSchlecter
    The King of Board
    Solar System
    Joined
    09 Feb '13
    Moves
    31423
    06 Mar '15 00:28
    what is a good time limit? 1 min is too fast to play good chess....

    but 5 min is still a good enough to play decent chess....

    there are very fast players in the room...

    10 min.... is a eternity
  4. Joined
    10 Apr '14
    Moves
    273
    07 Mar '15 00:382 edits
    A not so classic bishop sac but its going in my memory banks. Open f file knight on e5 queen on d1 and the bishop on the b1-h7 diagonal against a castled king without the defending knight on f6 = bxf7+
  5. Joined
    15 Aug '12
    Moves
    11620
    07 Mar '15 22:15
    Originally posted by Schlecter
    what is the name?????.... I play as ziro_the_gray in chess.com
    and nevergambits in lychess.org

    five min.... 0 bonus
    NF82
  6. e4
    Joined
    06 May '08
    Moves
    42492
    09 Mar '15 13:15
    My attempt in the last blog to get a crowd on the blitz site on Sunday
    was a spectacular failure. Every time I paid a visit there 5-6 and no more.

    It may because it has no rating or record of Wins, Draws, Losses that people
    find it so unpopular.
  7. Joined
    18 Feb '10
    Moves
    0
    09 Mar '15 13:17
    I find it a horrible interface. I don't like playing with an increment on principal, but without it I just keep losing on time because the physical act of moving a piece takes so long.
  8. Standard memberSchlecter
    The King of Board
    Solar System
    Joined
    09 Feb '13
    Moves
    31423
    09 Mar '15 14:062 edits
    Originally posted by greenpawn34
    My attempt in the last blog to get a crowd on the blitz site on Sunday
    was a spectacular failure. Every time I paid a visit there 5-6 and no more.

    It may because it has no rating or record of Wins, Draws, Losses that people
    find it so unpopular.
    This is why I love the RHP blitz, is like a trainning place,
    like a tea room,or a place just to play chess without nothing to lost.

    I warm in RHP and then I change to the lichess.org or chess.com to play rated games.

    Even better in lichess you can play blitz against a computer (no-rated game)

    Rigth now nobody is in the blitz room
  9. Joined
    11 Feb '08
    Moves
    13253
    09 Mar '15 16:49
    I'm a fan of RHP in general, it's where I got back into chess after a very long hiatus, and the forums are good.
    However, the blitz site is just prehistoric.
    No pre-moves combined with the extremely clunky interface make increments a necessity, and it becomes really hard to justify spending time in the blitz room when I could just be at a more blitz friendly website (I use chess.com).
  10. Standard memberSchlecter
    The King of Board
    Solar System
    Joined
    09 Feb '13
    Moves
    31423
    09 Mar '15 18:09
    Originally posted by WeeDSteM
    I'm a fan of RHP in general, it's where I got back into chess after a very long hiatus, and the forums are good.
    However, the blitz site is just prehistoric.
    No pre-moves combined with the extremely clunky interface make increments a necessity, and it becomes really hard to justify spending time in the blitz room when I could just be at a more blitz friendly website (I use chess.com).
    chess.com username please? mine is ziro_the_gray
  11. Joined
    10 Apr '14
    Moves
    273
    10 Mar '15 06:031 edit
    Just finished off this beauty

  12. Standard memberwolfgang59
    Quiz Master
    RHP Arms
    Joined
    09 Jun '07
    Moves
    48793
    10 Mar '15 06:20
    Originally posted by Data Fly
    I find it a horrible interface. I don't like playing with an increment on principal, but without it I just keep losing on time because the physical act of moving a piece takes so long.
    I only play with an increment unless its long game (10 mins).

    On chess.com I play 1 min and 8 sec increment. It normally
    equates to a 5 min game but without the pain of timing out.
  13. Standard memberbyedidia
    Mister Why
    San Carlos, CA
    Joined
    21 Feb '12
    Moves
    6039
    10 Mar '15 17:35
    Originally posted by iChopWoodForFree
    Just finished off this beauty

    [pgn]1. e4 e5 2. f4 exf4 3. Nf3 g5 4. Nc3 Bg7 5. g3 fxg3 6. hxg3 c6 7. d4 b5 8. Bxg5 f6 9. Bf4 b4 10. Nh4 bxc3 11. Qh5+ Ke7 12. Nf5+ Ke6 13. d5+ cxd5 14. exd5+ Kxd5 15. Nxg7+ Kd4 16. O-O-O+ Ke4 17. Bg2+ 1-0

    [/pgn]
    Nice pseudo-sac on c3.
  14. Joined
    18 Feb '10
    Moves
    0
    11 Mar '15 13:00
    From playok.com/en/chess:

    I feel like a Grandmaster on that site!
  15. Joined
    15 Aug '12
    Moves
    11620
    11 Mar '15 13:28
    Originally posted by Data Fly
    From playok.com/en/chess:
    [pgn]1. f4 e5 2. d3 exf4 3. Bxf4 Qf6 4. Qd2 Qxb2 5. Qc3 Bb4 0-1[/pgn]
    I feel like a Grandmaster on that site!
    You in the blitz room here?
Back to Top

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.I Agree