Originally posted by King Tiger Agree. I play on chess.com for blitz chess, not here. Wish Russ would put more effort into it (hint). I'm confident many players would make use of it.
what is the name?????.... I play as ziro_the_gray in chess.com
and nevergambits in lychess.org
A not so classic bishop sac but its going in my memory banks. Open f file knight on e5 queen on d1 and the bishop on the b1-h7 diagonal against a castled king without the defending knight on f6 = bxf7+
I find it a horrible interface. I don't like playing with an increment on principal, but without it I just keep losing on time because the physical act of moving a piece takes so long.
Originally posted by greenpawn34 My attempt in the last blog to get a crowd on the blitz site on Sunday
was a spectacular failure. Every time I paid a visit there 5-6 and no more.
It may because it has no rating or record of Wins, Draws, Losses that people
find it so unpopular.
This is why I love the RHP blitz, is like a trainning place,
like a tea room,or a place just to play chess without nothing to lost.
I warm in RHP and then I change to the lichess.org or chess.com to play rated games.
Even better in lichess you can play blitz against a computer (no-rated game)
I'm a fan of RHP in general, it's where I got back into chess after a very long hiatus, and the forums are good.
However, the blitz site is just prehistoric.
No pre-moves combined with the extremely clunky interface make increments a necessity, and it becomes really hard to justify spending time in the blitz room when I could just be at a more blitz friendly website (I use chess.com).
Originally posted by WeeDSteM I'm a fan of RHP in general, it's where I got back into chess after a very long hiatus, and the forums are good.
However, the blitz site is just prehistoric.
No pre-moves combined with the extremely clunky interface make increments a necessity, and it becomes really hard to justify spending time in the blitz room when I could just be at a more blitz friendly website (I use chess.com).
Originally posted by Data Fly I find it a horrible interface. I don't like playing with an increment on principal, but without it I just keep losing on time because the physical act of moving a piece takes so long.
I only play with an increment unless its long game (10 mins).
On chess.com I play 1 min and 8 sec increment. It normally
equates to a 5 min game but without the pain of timing out.
Originally posted by Data Fly From playok.com/en/chess:
[pgn]1. f4 e5 2. d3 exf4 3. Bxf4 Qf6 4. Qd2 Qxb2 5. Qc3 Bb4 0-1[/pgn]
I feel like a Grandmaster on that site!