Go back
Brain Busting Variant!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Brain Busting Variant!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Only Chess

ketchuplover
Isolated Pawn

Wisconsin USA

Joined
09 Dec 01
Moves
71666
Clock
07 Feb 14

CHESS 1,625,702,400 aka Random Pawn Placement 🙂

Ponderable
chemist

Linkenheim

Joined
22 Apr 05
Moves
669930
Clock
08 Feb 14
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by ketchuplover
CHESS 1,625,702,400 aka Random Pawn Placement 🙂
would you elaborate? I for one can't do anything with the information provided.

dzirilli
Duchampion

Joined
18 Feb 09
Moves
35281
Clock
08 Feb 14
Vote Up
Vote Down

I'm assuming that's the number of possible starting positions if you place the pawns randomly

C
Cowboy From Hell

American West

Joined
19 Apr 10
Moves
55013
Clock
08 Feb 14
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by ketchuplover
CHESS 1,625,702,400 aka Random Pawn Placement 🙂
I saw this being discussed at another site. 🙂

W

Joined
29 Oct 09
Moves
1421
Clock
08 Feb 14
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by dzirilli
I'm assuming that's the number of possible starting positions if you place the pawns randomly
It does not seem to be. The number is equal to 8! squared, which can't possibly be the number of ways to place pawns on the board. It could be a miscalculated number of ways to place all the non-pawns on their respective starting ranks -- there the mistake would at least make sense.

wolfgang59
Quiz Master

RHP Arms

Joined
09 Jun 07
Moves
48794
Clock
08 Feb 14
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by WanderingKing
It does not seem to be. The number is equal to 8! squared, which can't possibly be the number of ways to place pawns on the board. It could be a miscalculated number of ways to place all the non-pawns on their respective starting ranks -- there the mistake would at least make sense.
8! would be the number of ways of setting up your own pawns at the start
(given that the pawns are distinguishable)
Take into account the opponents permutations as well and you get (8!)x(8!)

ketchuplover
Isolated Pawn

Wisconsin USA

Joined
09 Dec 01
Moves
71666
Clock
08 Feb 14
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by wolfgang59
8! would be the number of ways of setting up your own pawns at the start
(given that the pawns are distinguishable)
Take into account the opponents permutations as well and you get (8!)x(8!)
Does 8! = 1x2x3x4x5x6x7x8 ? Someone on another site thinks I am including missing pawns. Never thought of them.

wolfgang59
Quiz Master

RHP Arms

Joined
09 Jun 07
Moves
48794
Clock
09 Feb 14
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by ketchuplover
Does 8! = 1x2x3x4x5x6x7x8 ?
YES!

D
Losing the Thread

Quarantined World

Joined
27 Oct 04
Moves
87415
Clock
09 Feb 14
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by wolfgang59
8! would be the number of ways of setting up your own pawns at the start
(given that the pawns are distinguishable)
Take into account the opponents permutations as well and you get (8!)x(8!)
Except that pawns are indistinguishable so the correct number of ways of setting up the pawns at the start is 1.

If you had the pawns go anywhere where there aren't pieces, and avoiding the initial position involving a check then there are C(46,8)*C(38,8) ways of placing the pawns (C(N,M) = binomial coefficient = N!/(N-M)!M!).

wolfgang59
Quiz Master

RHP Arms

Joined
09 Jun 07
Moves
48794
Clock
09 Feb 14
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by DeepThought
Except that pawns are indistinguishable so the correct number of ways of setting up the pawns at the start is 1.

Each pawn has its own character. I have one little fellow who is very aggressive ... always a tough call to start him on c2 or e2

W

Joined
29 Oct 09
Moves
1421
Clock
09 Feb 14
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by DeepThought
Except that pawns are indistinguishable so the correct number of ways of setting up the pawns at the start is 1.
Indeed. (I'm not checking the other half -- I have a hangover to cure.)

wolfgang59
Quiz Master

RHP Arms

Joined
09 Jun 07
Moves
48794
Clock
09 Feb 14
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by WanderingKing
Indeed. (I'm not checking the other half -- I have a hangover to cure.)
Greasy bacon sandwich washed down with
a pint of fresh OJ & tonic water (50/50)

trust me

s
Fast and Curious

slatington, pa, usa

Joined
28 Dec 04
Moves
53321
Clock
09 Feb 14
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by DeepThought
Except that pawns are indistinguishable so the correct number of ways of setting up the pawns at the start is 1.

If you had the pawns go anywhere where there aren't pieces, and avoiding the initial position involving a check then there are C(46,8)*C(38,8) ways of placing the pawns (C(N,M) = binomial coefficient = N!/(N-M)!M!).
What does the 46,8 and 38,8 stand for? What does that number come out to?
I assume N=46? or 38?

a

Joined
19 Feb 02
Moves
32077
Clock
10 Feb 14
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by sonhouse
What does the 46,8 and 38,8 stand for? What does that number come out to?
I assume N=46? or 38?
I think:

C(46,8)*C(38,8) ways of placing the pawns (C(N,M) = binomial coefficient = N!/(N-M)!M!).

translates into:

46!/(46-8)!8! * 38!/(38-8)!8!

So you apply the formula twice, once with N=46, M=8 and once with N=38, M=8. And then multiply those two.
Whether the outcome is correct, is another story.

Ponderable
chemist

Linkenheim

Joined
22 Apr 05
Moves
669930
Clock
10 Feb 14
Vote Up
Vote Down

Since I am quite dumb:

You propose to put pawns on the second and seventh row rexpectively. Then you go and permuatet their position.

What is the difference to the nomrla person with the transmutations?

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.