13 Nov '08 09:45>
Originally posted by robbie carrobieThis is exactly the reason why you have to get it -it's a pure struggle over space, therefore you have to think deep regarding moblility, therefore you are deep into dynamics.
lol, i heard that its actually very high brow, you know for dudes rated around 2000, not little ol tweety pie village peasants like me who manage to scrape through to the endgame hoping that somehow a passed pawn will be created that i can push whilst supping my irn bru and eating a cold Gregs cheese a onion pasty. i have to admit beetle dude that i ...[text shortened]... ake is possible, perhaps not so in the end game, the importance of squares rather than pieces!
Dvoretsky shows how exactly you may achieve the highest degree of collaboration and mutual protection of the pieces. Then comes again the phase of potential accumulation because dynamism is, as you know my trustee feer, the potential activity of your pieces and your pawns.
Hard! And who ever did claimed that chess is an easy task ye numptie?
Go and get it. Dig it slowly, never hurry, it takes years. Practice hard, enjoy every move. Feel free to win and learn to loose, make no two times the same mistake. Every mistake of yours must be different.
Have a good time afterall 😵