17 Mar '07 00:24>
I'm looking for suggestion for a book on calculation technique.
Any suggestions (except Kotov's old tome)?
Any suggestions (except Kotov's old tome)?
Originally posted by GolubI've read about this exercise:
Actually, if someone has ideas for how to improve calculation ability in other ways, I'm quite interested in it too..
And I should add I am NOT interested in combinations and tactics of that sort. I am interested in calculating many different variations (possibly including tactics).
Originally posted by RahimKSounds interesting (and a lot cheaper). Have you tried it yourself? I feel that going up to 1700-1800 requires good calculation, and while I can get a win here and there, it is mostly my calculation and tactics that fail me in the end.
I've read about this exercise:
Take a messy position from Kasp. or some other GM. Say a middlegame position with lots of pieces still on the board, no clear plan for either side and lots of imbalances.
Get out a piece of paper and start writing out all the variation you can see as deep as you can go. After that give the resulting position a value, white ...[text shortened]... easily!
Other then that, do tactics and combinations in your head. That's how I learnt.
Originally posted by Golublol. I'm rated 1,800 on a good day and can't calculate my way out of a paper bag. On this site, because it is correspondence chess, I can use the analysis board to compensate - but even so miss loads of stuff.
Sounds interesting (and a lot cheaper). Have you tried it yourself? I feel that going up to 1700-1800 requires good calculation, and while I can get a win here and there, it is mostly my calculation and tactics that fail me in the end.
Originally posted by DeepThoughtI am sorry, it is exactly what I meant. I was refering to such a strength in "live" chess, I should perhaps have mentioned it.
lol. I'm rated 1,800 on a good day and can't calculate my way out of a paper bag. On this site, because it is correspondence chess, I can use the analysis board to compensate - but even so miss loads of stuff.
Originally posted by DeepThoughtEven though I think it somewhat flawed to write down variations, I think I am going to try that approach. At least I get some brain work-out, if nothing else.
Excelling at chess calculation by Agaard, which giantrobot mentionned above is a good book; but the basic technique for improving calculation is practice of the form recommended by RahimK in his post, and is essentially what Kotov says to do in Think Like a Grandmaster.
Originally posted by GolubMy playing style involves aiming for positions that I can keep control over and don't have to worry so much about the type of tactical complications that are going cause me calculational problems, I rely heavily on pattern recognition and intuition to compensate for not being great at calculation. It causes problems for me here as the analysis board only helps you so much, if you can calculate accurately in your head then you end up finding things on the analysis board that you wouldn't otherwise (again, a bit like arithmetic and using calculators). The main thing to bear in mind is that your opponent probably can't calculate very well either so any work you do to improve calculation will get more results than any amount of opening work and so on.
I am sorry, it is exactly what I meant. I was refering to such a strength in "live" chess, I should perhaps have mentioned it.
Originally posted by GolubWhy not just do it right? There are no shortcuts to learning how to calculate properly. At least follow those who's methods have been proven to work at the highest levels (e.g. the GMs mentioned in this thread) and not some nonsense like gaining 200 points per exercise (that initial article actually claims 100 points, which is still nonsense).
Even though I think it somewhat flawed to write down variations, I think I am going to try that approach. At least I get some brain work-out, if nothing else.