Originally posted by Diophantus
If those are the most blatant cheats why have a significant number been on the site blatantly cheating since 2007 or 2008? That suggests that either the previous system didn't catch even the blatant cheats, begging the question just what it did catch, or the new system has some unsuspected flaw. Either way, something isn't right. Not that I shall worry unduly, I don't play there at all, I just observe the antics from the sidelines.
I asked a strong club player why he didn't play online CC and he said "the internet is full of cheats. I can play against Rybka at home."
The actions at chess.com seem to support the claims of widespread naughtiness when people play chess whilst seperated by an internet connection.
Still, nice to know there are hardly any engine users here! 🙂
I say once again, I very much doubt that the owner of chess.com wants to ban innocent paying members. Can you think of a reason why he'd do that?
All I can think is that the previous method was only used to boot idiotic cheats, whereas the new system clearly casts the net far wider.
The owner said that those banned are playing far more engine-like chess than the best legitimate CC & OTB players. Many of the long-term members recently banned have been analysed by myself & others & found to be blatant cheats.
'About time' & 'long overdue' are 2 phrases that spring to mind with regard to this issue.