1. Account suspended
    Joined
    14 Nov '06
    Moves
    17862
    15 Mar '07 18:47
    I hear people on here talking about begginers and advanced chess players etc. etc... but what's the general consensus on what constitutes a beginner? My rating is roughly 1400, and I don't consider myself a beginner, but when i look at other 1400 players games, some players look to me to be closer to 1000 or 1100.

    Anyways, this is really just a vote:
    At what rating do you go from beginner to advanced beginner to intermediate to expert? Lookin for opinions more than anything (if u wanna look at my games to get a bit of a benchmark for a 1400 go ahead)
  2. Joined
    18 Feb '07
    Moves
    1345
    15 Mar '07 18:59
    I would say in general:

    0-1200 is amatuer
    1200-1600 is average
    1600-2200 is intermediate
    2200-2500 is expert
    2500 and above is master
  3. Account suspended
    Joined
    14 Nov '06
    Moves
    17862
    15 Mar '07 19:01
    wow... i thought 2200 in ELO or FIDE or whatever constituted an international master or something (of course, rhp is probably not THAT accurate)
  4. Joined
    23 Jul '05
    Moves
    8869
    15 Mar '07 19:01
    Originally posted by Zander 88
    I would say in general:

    0-1200 is amatuer
    1200-1600 is average
    1600-2200 is intermediate
    2200-2500 is expert
    2500 and above is master
    Ooh, intermediate, I feel so proud. 😏
  5. Joined
    01 Feb '07
    Moves
    7819
    15 Mar '07 19:01
    Here is the USCF Rating Classification:

    Senior Master above 2399
    Master 2200-2399
    Expert 2000-2199
    Class A 1800-1999
    Class B 1600-1799
    Class C 1400-1599
    Class D 1200-1399
    Class E 1000-1199
    Class F 800- 999
    Class G 600- 799
    Class H 400- 599
    Class I 200- 399
    Class J Under 200

    I'd consider a beginner to be anyone from Class E and under.
  6. Standard memberMathurine
    sorozatgyilkos
    leΓΆlΓ©s ellenfeleim
    Joined
    15 Jul '06
    Moves
    40507
    15 Mar '07 19:01
    Originally posted by ih8sens
    I hear people on here talking about begginers and advanced chess players etc. etc... but what's the general consensus on what constitutes a beginner? My rating is roughly 1400, and I don't consider myself a beginner, but when i look at other 1400 players games, some players look to me to be closer to 1000 or 1100.

    Anyways, this is really just a vote:
    At ...[text shortened]... re than anything (if u wanna look at my games to get a bit of a benchmark for a 1400 go ahead)
    You might find the following link of use, ih8sens...

    http://www.exeterchessclub.org.uk/bcftable.html#classes

    πŸ™‚
  7. Joined
    28 Nov '06
    Moves
    4374
    15 Mar '07 20:511 edit
    Originally posted by 93confirmed
    Here is the USCF Rating Classification:

    Senior Master above 2399
    Master 2200-2399
    Expert 2000-2199
    Class A 1800-1999
    Class B 1600-1799
    Class C 1400-1599
    Class D 1200-1399
    Class E 1000-1199
    Class F 800- 999
    Class G 600- 799
    Class H 400- 599
    Class I 200- 399
    Class J Under 200

    I'd consider a beginner to be anyone from Class E and under.
    And if you are in Class J, perhaps chess isn't your game. Competitively speaking, of course.
  8. Joined
    11 Sep '06
    Moves
    17376
    15 Mar '07 20:58
    Originally posted by AlphaAlekhine
    And if you are in Class J, perhaps chess isn't your game. Competitively speaking, of course.
    Well, some little kids start down there. A coworker of mine has a child who has a provisional rating of 100, even though they won 1 game in their first tournament - just because all the other players were very lowly rated as well. πŸ™‚

    I'd say class E is sort of the borderline of respectability, between being a beginner/unskilled player, and starting up the ladder of having some ability.
  9. Joined
    28 Nov '06
    Moves
    4374
    15 Mar '07 20:59
    Originally posted by OrangeKing
    Well, some little kids start down there. A coworker of mine has a child who has a provisional rating of 100, even though they won 1 game in their first tournament - just because all the other players were very lowly rated as well. πŸ™‚

    I'd say class E is sort of the borderline of respectability, between being a beginner/unskilled player, and starting up the ladder of having some ability.
    Well, there are kids; didn't really consider that. But at that level, it's less competition and more fun. Wouldn't you say?
  10. Joined
    25 Nov '06
    Moves
    15537
    15 Mar '07 21:06
    Originally posted by AlphaAlekhine
    Well, there are kids; didn't really consider that. But at that level, it's less competition and more fun. Wouldn't you say?
    Nope. I was playing properly competitive (team league and cups and individual tournaments) from the age of 7, and it was most definitely competitive.
Back to Top

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.I Agree