Cludi Deciding to Leave

Originally posted by gambit05
It was a reply to this:

"Originally posted by Amsterdamn
It's a fact that this person was not granted his win in a tournament after the evidence of engine-use was shown to Russ.."

Strangely enough, it still shows as being in progress.

Originally posted by Nordlys
Strangely enough, it still shows as being in progress.

I think the 2007 could be lost to all now.

Originally posted by Pawn Qween
I think the 2007 could be lost to all now.

Too true. No matter whether or to whom it will be awarded, it'll always leave a bad aftertaste.

Originally posted by Ullr
Well I was going to say homosexual but Sasquatch probably would have taken that as a compliment and that would have defeated the purpose.

God has granted me the ability to simply disregard fools like you.

Originally posted by sasquatch672
God has granted me the ability to simply disregard fools like you.

So why don't you use that ability? 🙄

Originally posted by DawgHaus
Just as long as he's not peeing with computer assistance.

Believe me, sasquatch NEEDS mechanized toilet assistance.

Originally posted by Pawn Qween
Cludi's blag.

What? Like a blue bag?

Originally posted by Crowley
What? Like a blue bag?

Could be a black bag. Think of it as a black box only more squishy.

Originally posted by Nordlys
So why don't you use that ability? 🙄

I leave you alone, don't I?

Originally posted by sasquatch672
I leave you alone, don't I?

Sometimes.

Originally posted by Kepler
Could be a black bag. Think of it as a black box only more squishy.

Ah... Thants!

Originally posted by David Tebb
Sasquatch672 wrote [b]"I do know that attacking a person's integrity and honor without proof is shameful".

That is exactly what he has done to me in a series of vicious posts. He admits that he doesn't know me (or cludi, or English Tal, or anyone else involved in the episode), yet he has decided that my only motive for reporting cludi as a possible ...[text shortened]... o had higher engine matches than he did. I wonder when we will find out who they are?[/b]

David: you're right. I can assume to know your motives with no more certainty than you had about Mr. Jensen when this became public. I don't care to revisit previous posts in this thread. It was improper of me to assume you were motivated by jealousy or envy. Seems this day's excitement is over with.

Originally posted by sasquatch672
David: you're right. I can assume to know your motives with no more certainty than you had about Mr. Jensen when this became public. I don't care to revisit previous posts in this thread. It was improper of me to assume you were motivated by jealousy or envy. Seems this day's excitement is over with.

Ok, fair enough. Let's put it behind us.

Originally posted by eldragonfly
Please explain, otherwise i'm sure you'll agree that you have somehow wandered toward an irrelevant and possibly biased conclusion. Sure the consequences are not the same, i'll give you that, but that does not somehow magically remove or void the strange and "play innocent" behavior of the player in question. Ya' see it's a question of honor, not of str ...[text shortened]... generated via chess engines. And also the question of motivation should be examined here.

You go to jail if you bail on a trial, meaning there is more incentive to stay at a trial...you cannot compare that to this and say that just because he left he is automatically guilty! That would be the dumbest thing I had ever seen.

Originally posted by Crowley
What? Like a blue bag?

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=blag 😛