1. Joined
    05 Jan '05
    Moves
    7502
    17 Mar '05 15:55
    Just out of curiosity, what's correlation between RedHotPawn and USCF ratings? People with USCF rating, could you tell me your ratings, let's compare them! Given enough data, I could perform rigorous correlation analysis, just for fun.
  2. Hainesport, NJ, USA
    Joined
    22 Jun '04
    Moves
    17527
    17 Mar '05 16:05
    USCF 1835, RHP 1816. Both of which fluctuate wildly.
  3. Standard memberark13
    Enola Straight
    mouse mouse mouse
    Joined
    16 Jan '05
    Moves
    12804
    17 Mar '05 16:37
    USCF 1198 RHP 1594

    But a better way to figure out a coorelation would be to figure out the the rating to be in the top 10, 20, 50% on this site, and compare it to the top 10,20, 50% in USCF. If we assume about the same level of people play here as do in USCF OTB games, it should work
  4. Standard memberGalaxyShield
    Mr. Shield
    Joined
    02 Sep '04
    Moves
    174290
    17 Mar '05 17:01
    USCF-1248 RHP-1500-1600's.
  5. Joined
    17 Nov '01
    Moves
    31316
    17 Mar '05 19:26
    I don't know my uscf. I've only played in about 10 games or so, but I play on an equal level w/ 1500 players otb. Here my rating was usually around 1400-1450 a year ago, but I think as rhp has grown, ratings have gone up, since I've been back I've won most of my games and it seems likely that my rating here will level off over 1500.
  6. Standard memberGrandmouster
    ChessObsessed
    Earth
    Joined
    07 Mar '05
    Moves
    21049
    17 Mar '05 20:30
    depends on how often you play uscf rated tourneys.
    i play about once or twice a year, and have a 1570 or so rating.
    I play thousands of games on the net, and have an 1800-2000 rating.
    Playing a slow otb game in a tournament setting, is much different then playing who (or what) knows. over the web.
  7. Joined
    05 Jan '05
    Moves
    7502
    19 Mar '05 00:071 edit
    Originally posted by ark13
    USCF 1198 RHP 1594

    But a better way to figure out a coorelation would be to figure out the the rating to be in the top 10, 20, 50% on this site, and compare it to the top 10,20, 50% in USCF. If we assume about the same level of people play here as do in USCF OTB games, it should work


    good idea! I'll see if I can get these data.
  8. Standard memberWulebgr
    Angler
    River City
    Joined
    08 Dec '04
    Moves
    16907
    19 Feb '07 17:48
    RHP 1741 USCF 1718
  9. Edmonton, Alberta
    Joined
    25 Nov '04
    Moves
    2101
    19 Feb '07 18:40
    OTB 1889 - 60 to 70 games from 2004-2006

    Rhp 1821 - 71 games from 2005 basically to end of 2006.

    Pretty close compared to others.
  10. Standard memberrotk
    Orc slayer
    Gondor
    Joined
    20 Jan '06
    Moves
    15582
    19 Feb '07 21:10
    Originally posted by GalaxyShield
    USCF-1248 RHP-1500-1600's.
    now he is USCF 1500 and RHP 1800


    I'm about USCF 1608 RHP 1800,
    I do make treibble mistakes that should have stopped at 1300.
  11. Garner, NC
    Joined
    04 Nov '05
    Moves
    30849
    19 Feb '07 21:17
    Originally posted by Rostov
    Just out of curiosity, what's correlation between RedHotPawn and USCF ratings? People with USCF rating, could you tell me your ratings, let's compare them! Given enough data, I could perform rigorous correlation analysis, just for fun.
    USCF 1425 (last game 1998)
    RHP 1747
  12. Standard memberWulebgr
    Angler
    River City
    Joined
    08 Dec '04
    Moves
    16907
    19 Feb '07 21:36
    Originally posted by techsouth
    USCF 1425 (last game 1998)
    RHP 1747
    You need to play more OTB
  13. Standard memberSpacetime
    Not material
    The Universe
    Joined
    30 Jun '06
    Moves
    6775
    20 Feb '07 05:10
    Originally posted by Rostov
    Just out of curiosity, what's correlation between RedHotPawn and USCF ratings? People with USCF rating, could you tell me your ratings, let's compare them! Given enough data, I could perform rigorous correlation analysis, just for fun.
    You should get some other vars too, like use analyse board or not, use DB or not, and average time spent per move. I bet these would be significant in your regression.

    My theory is that RHP rating = b1*USCF+b2*use_board+b3*avg_time+b4*DB

    You know something like that...
  14. Standard memberSpacetime
    Not material
    The Universe
    Joined
    30 Jun '06
    Moves
    6775
    20 Feb '07 05:12
    Originally posted by Spacetime
    You should get some other vars too, like use analyse board or not, use DB or not, and average time spent per move. I bet these would be significant in your regression.

    My theory is that RHP rating = b1*USCF+b2*use_board+b3*avg_time+b4*DB

    You know something like that...
    Of course I just noticed you've been gone for like a year, so I guess you won't be doing any regressions any time soon - funny
  15. Garner, NC
    Joined
    04 Nov '05
    Moves
    30849
    20 Feb '07 16:14
    Originally posted by Wulebgr
    You need to play more OTB
    Indeed, I have had plans fall through 2 or 3 times in the last year. Since playing on RHP, I've improved significantly. Additionally, the USCF have been deliberately inflating their ratings. I think I could pack a mean punch for a 1425 player and perhaps surprise a few people. At the very least it would be nice to test the waters. I view OTB as "real" chess and all else as practice.
Back to Top

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.I Agree