1. Joined
    29 Aug '09
    Moves
    1574
    16 Apr '10 12:49
    Developing quickly in the opening is not a leisurely activity.
    Its more than simply moving a new piece into the centre every move.

    Chess is a fight right from the start.

    Look for tactics or combinations that don`t win you any material but instead result in you being ahead in development.

    Try to force yourself to be ahead in development by forcing means.
    For example sacrifice material in order to be ahead in development.
  2. Joined
    29 Aug '09
    Moves
    1574
    16 Apr '10 14:48
    Oops I spelled Daily wrong.

    Correction....Daley chess thought
    πŸ™‚
  3. Joined
    12 Mar '03
    Moves
    44411
    16 Apr '10 15:40
    that's a relief
  4. Standard memberSwissGambit
    Caninus Interruptus
    2014.05.01
    Joined
    11 Apr '07
    Moves
    92274
    16 Apr '10 17:20
    Originally posted by National Master Dale
    Developing quickly in the opening is not a leisurely activity.
    Its more than simply moving a new piece into the centre every move.

    Chess is a fight right from the start.

    Look for tactics or combinations that don`t win you any material but instead result in you being ahead in development.

    Try to force yourself to be ahead in development by forcing means.
    For example sacrifice material in order to be ahead in development.
    I like to sacrifice development in order to be ahead in material. πŸ˜•
  5. Joined
    09 Mar '10
    Moves
    1460
    16 Apr '10 19:28
    Originally posted by SwissGambit
    I like to sacrifice development in order to be ahead in material. πŸ˜•
    Your not actually winning material, you're just borrowing it. Eventually, you'll have to return it, and probably with interest!
  6. Joined
    12 Nov '06
    Moves
    74414
    16 Apr '10 19:38
    Originally posted by Artardo
    Your not actually winning material, you're just borrowing it. Eventually, you'll have to return it, and probably with interest!
    By that logic, then gambits must be the best openingsπŸ™„

    I think you need to find a balance between materialism and development, because if you take either to the extreme, you will lose games.
  7. Standard memberSwissGambit
    Caninus Interruptus
    2014.05.01
    Joined
    11 Apr '07
    Moves
    92274
    16 Apr '10 19:45
    Originally posted by Artardo
    Your not actually winning material, you're just borrowing it. Eventually, you'll have to return it, and probably with interest!
    Whatever you say, 'tardo. πŸ˜€
  8. Joined
    09 Mar '10
    Moves
    1460
    16 Apr '10 20:231 edit
    Originally posted by KnightStalker47
    By that logic, then gambits must be the best openingsπŸ™„
    That would depend on how good you are at debt collection. I personally don't play many gambits, because my debt collecting abilities absolutely suck πŸ˜‰
  9. Joined
    26 Jan '10
    Moves
    1174
    16 Apr '10 21:07
    Originally posted by SwissGambit
    I like to sacrifice development in order to be ahead in material. πŸ˜•
    I sacrifice everything to win

    Time, social life, babies...
  10. Standard memberbill718
    Enigma
    Seattle
    Joined
    03 Sep '06
    Moves
    3298
    18 Apr '10 11:59
    Originally posted by National Master Dale
    Developing quickly in the opening is not a leisurely activity.
    Its more than simply moving a new piece into the centre every move.

    Chess is a fight right from the start.

    Look for tactics or combinations that don`t win you any material but instead result in you being ahead in development.

    Try to force yourself to be ahead in development by forcing means.
    For example sacrifice material in order to be ahead in development.
    At least you make more sense than cheater 1
  11. Joined
    11 Nov '05
    Moves
    43938
    18 Apr '10 12:58
    One point of material advantage is exactly the same worth as one point of strategic advantage.

    I gladly sac my queen to have a sure mate in sight.
    But I also gladly let my opponent sac antyhing that is unsound.
  12. Joined
    24 Jun '08
    Moves
    50
    18 Apr '10 14:57

    This post is unavailable.

    Please refer to our posting guidelines.

  13. Standard memberwormwood
    If Theres Hell Below
    We're All Gonna Go!
    Joined
    10 Sep '05
    Moves
    10228
    18 Apr '10 18:20
    Originally posted by FabianFnas
    One point of material advantage is exactly the same worth as one point of strategic advantage.

    I gladly sac my queen to have a sure mate in sight.
    But I also gladly let my opponent sac antyhing that is unsound.
    how does one obtain a point of strategic advantage?
  14. Joined
    19 Jun '06
    Moves
    847
    18 Apr '10 18:27
    Originally posted by wormwood
    how does one obtain a point of strategic advantage?
    Never mind that... I'm still trying to figure out how he'd refuse to let his opponent sac something that's sound.
  15. Joined
    16 Oct '09
    Moves
    2448
    18 Apr '10 19:22
    Originally posted by Mad Rook
    Never mind that... I'm still trying to figure out how he'd refuse to let his opponent sac something that's sound.
    we have so much to learn πŸ™
Back to Top

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.I Agree