Originally posted by KeplerHere's the replay...
I wasn't the one making the suggestion.
- an RHP player's games become the subject of analysis
- there is mention of what an OTB GM's match up would be, for purposes of comparison
- some people mention Capablanca and Morphy out of curiosity
- I then say that I think a top CC player would be more like an engine than a top OTB GM
- people then wrongly interpret this as "CC players play like engines"
Originally posted by VarenkaThat's about how I remember it. I'll have to try an OTB GM sometime and see if Berliner matches more or less.
Here's the replay...
- an RHP player's games become the subject of analysis
- there is mention of what an OTB GM's match up would be, for purposes of comparison
- some people mention Capablanca and Morphy out of curiosity
- I then say that I think a top CC player would be more like an engine than a top OTB GM
- people then wrongly interpret this as "CC players play like engines"
Originally posted by !~TONY~!Of so you imply. Show me this theory, where it starts and where it ends. Thread 97179 and this "scientific" pseudo-babble is quite amazing and entertaining, i must say.
This parameter applies solely to moves after theory ends.