26 Jan '12 23:10>3 edits
Originally posted by ErekosePeople have a hard time understanding tactics.
I'd put it this way - tactics are indespensible for executing a strategy correctly.
Basically, if you mess up the tactics, no strategy is good enough, and virtually all winning strategies have tactical elements necessary to take the full point home.
They think it has to do with material only. However, material is a strategic element and having more material isn't necessarily always best just like doubled pawns aren't always bad.
Tactics are maneuvers designed to give strategic superiority whether it is material or weaknesses in the enemy camp or checkmating the king which is the ultimate strategic goal. Strategy is really understanding and judgement... you have to know what the correct immediate goal is.
For example, some people see weak pawns and just try to attack them but the correct immediate goal is to make them immobile first. The manuever that allows you to make them immobile is a tactic.
Tactics are to orchestra as strategy is to conductor... tactics are the moves and strategy is the guiding ideas behind the moves.
Edit: The greats know which strategic goals to go after based on the position,this is the key, you have to look at the position and break it down until you have some ideas on what to do... you won't always have the best or clearest idea but it is better and more fulfilling than just pushing wood.
Sometimes there will be some weakness combined with some loose pieces and it leads to dazzling combinations... you will never create these without knowing how to assess the position.