Originally posted by wargamer66
His main illustrative game is Ackerman-King, Bern 1992...
[Event "Open"]
[Site "Amsterdam NED"]
[Date "1992.02.??"]
[Round "2"]
[White "Ackermann, R"]
[Black "King, Daniel J"]
[TimeControl "-"]
[Result "0-1"]
[ECO "B21"]
[WhiteELO "2295"]
[BlackELO "2505"]
[BlackTitle "IGM"]
[WhiteCountry "SUI"]
[BlackCountry "ENG"]
1.e4 c5 2.d4 cxd4 3.c3 dxc3 4.Nxc3 Nc6 5.Nf3 d6 6.Bc4 a6 7.0-0 Nf6 8.Qe2 Bg4 9.Rd1 e6 10.Bf4 Qb8 11.h3 Bxf3 12.Qxf3 Be7 13.Rac1
0-0 14.Bb3 Rc8 15.Qe3 b5 16.Bg5 Na5 17.f4 h6 18.Bh4 Ng4 19.hxg4 Bxh4 20.g5 hxg5 21.f5 Nxb3 22.axb3 g4 23.fxe6 fxe6 24.Qf4 Bf6
25.Qxg4 Re8 26.e5 Bxe5 27.Ne4 Qb6+ 28.Kh1 Qe3 29.Rc7 Qh6+ 30.Kg1 d5 0-1
Well wouldn't you know! 🙂
Gallagher's main idea (according to wargamer66 who has the book) is the line that z00t thinks is a poor defence & also the one I said is most often used as the example of best play by black.
Notice also the incorrect
7.0-0? played by Ackerman, instead of
7.Bg5! which I stated earlier was the only progressive move for white.
Inaccurate but common mistakes like this abound in the Morra (especially when white is much lower rated as here) which is why the database results are so poor, MonkeyMaker7...