- Joined
- 10 Jan 08
- Moves
- 16951
22 Jan 12
Originally posted by ExumaIt might be within the TOS but it's hardly what you want to be playing against... it's basically plagiarism.
Easy there now...
This is within the TOS, and the tradition of CC chess. Published human analysis, the latest chess mag whatever. Radio matches same thing.
Any one who uses databases to make their moves should have a * beside their rating... i don't want to play them.
22 Jan 12
Originally posted by Trev33I remember most of my database anyway... LOL.
It might be within the TOS but it's hardly what you want to be playing against... it's basically plagiarism.
Any one who uses databases to make their moves should have a * beside their rating... i don't want to play them.
22 Jan 12
Originally posted by tomtom232I haven't used DB's... but I don't think it loses much. If I did use a DB I'd just get stuck in positions I haven't studied. Without it, I feel pretty comfortable most of the time.
I remember most of my database anyway... LOL.
There might be a few positions I'll check into it - English Symmetrical is one. I can't really think of anything else where I need more DB work. It may be valuable for newer players though... or if you recorded your own games and checked where you're weakest?
Q
22 Jan 12
Originally posted by PhySiQI generally don't use them anymore but I have become so familiar with most of the ideas in the openings I use that I could play them many moves deep or I can leave "book" early knowing that my idea fits if I have a hunch that my opponent doesn't know what to do.
I haven't used DB's... but I don't think it loses much. If I did use a DB I'd just get stuck in positions I haven't studied. Without it, I feel pretty comfortable most of the time.
There might be a few positions I'll check into it - English Symmetrical is one. I can't really think of anything else where I need more DB work. It may be valuable for newe ...[text shortened]... ers though... or if you recorded your own games and checked where you're weakest?
Q
22 Jan 12
1 edit
Originally posted by tomtom232For instance.
I generally don't use them anymore but I have become so familiar with most of the ideas in the openings I use that I could play them many moves deep or I can leave "book" early knowing that my idea fits if I have a hunch that my opponent doesn't know what to do.
This game my opponent leaves book at move 8 (I didn't even know we were still in book at that point) but the ideas still flow until I start to get in time trouble... I still try to use constructive ideas and they work out but only because my opponent blundered.
22 Jan 12
Originally posted by Trev33This is interesting, and I admit I have felt this on occasion, more than 10 moves into some game, not playing chess but copying. Opening books lead to this also. On the other hand, all the openings I play are copied from someone at some point, learning chess is learning ideas from someone else no? How many moves is too many to copy?
It might be within the TOS but it's hardly what you want to be playing against... it's basically plagiarism.
Any one who uses databases to make their moves should have a * beside their rating... i don't want to play them.
Originally posted by ExumaI copy the dragon all the time, and there have been 10 move sequences in this opening that I have regularly followed. I would never have been able to come up with the dragon on my own, so is it plagiarism now I use it? 😉
This is interesting, and I admit I have felt this on occasion, more than 10 moves into some game, not playing chess but copying.
22 Jan 12
Originally posted by morgskiThe dragon is a draw - if you copy the moves you will see 😉
I copy the dragon all the time, and there have been 10 move sequences in this opening that I have regularly followed. I would never have been able to come up with the dragon on my own, so is it plagiarism now I use it? 😉