07 Jul '08 10:26>
Of cource the above mentioned msg refers to "Against the Sicilian: 1. e4 c5 2. d4 ed 3. c3 dc 4. Nxc3 (Smith-Morra Gambit)" quoted by our friend Dejection;
Originally posted by black beetleplease sir you do yourself an injustice, 'patzer', is such a derogatory term, we are all at different levels of progression, nothing is static, and when one is motivated by love, what stronger motivational force can there be? -
...and surely it was a clear win for the Black! Kindly please excuse me for these funny mistakes, I am working right now and I am constantly under pressure; I 'm a chess addicted patzer🙂
Originally posted by black beetleThat's just the Classical Main Line.
Smith-Morra is pitiful when the Black knows how to proceed; just check a game I had against an ideal Smith-Morra, which was a clear win for the White;
[Event "Casual Game"]
[Site "http://www.itsyourturn.com"]
[Date "2008.02.24"]
[Round "*"]
[White "Don"]
[Black "black beetle"]
[Result "0-1"]
[Ply "58"]
1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 d6 3. d4 cxd4 4. c3 dxc3 ...[text shortened]... 25. Qe2 Kg7 26. Rb1 Ra5 27. Kh2
Qd7 28. Rf1 Ra4 29. Qc2 b5 0-1
best regards
Originally posted by black beetleThe point is, after 1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 d6 3.d4 cxd4 4.c3 dxc3 5.Nxc3 Nc6
I agree that the White can do without 10.h3 but then the Black is free to choose between the castling and the pin with fine play; and surely the line 11.Be3 you mentioned is correct.
I don't ubderrate this gambit as Black because it's easy for the White to convert his sac material into initiative. However once the Black is devoted to the Sicilian is ready to fight hard against by far more ruthless lines (Keres attack, Fianchetto, Sozin etc.);
Originally posted by black beetleThe Elo ratings are very funny eh? 😀
I also noticed that you keep on training with CT-ART 3.0, my friend; fantastic program, I use it for at least one hour per day. Still being at the practice mode (since March 2008 I had four times the excercises 1-602, with first elo rating 2073 and last 2188. Very well for only 4 months' study);
Originally posted by black beetleI've just dug-out my old copy of Burgess' Winning With The Smith-Morra Gambit 1993 & here's his take on the line:
I agree that the White can do without 10.h3 but then the Black is free to choose between the castling and the pin with fine play; and surely the line 11.Be3 you mentioned is correct.
I don't ubderrate this gambit as Black because it's easy for the White to convert his sac material into initiative. However once the Black is devoted to the Sicilian is ready to fight hard against by far more ruthless lines (Keres attack, Fianchetto, Sozin etc.);