09 Jan '09 11:11>7 edits
Originally posted by Fat LadyI'm amazed the Fritz match-up was so high in the Fischer-Spassky match, current wisdom is that the 1972 Fischer would be slaughtered by the likes of Anand, Topalov etc. It looks to me like this is simply incorrect.
I'm amazed the Fritz match-up was so high in the Fischer-Spassky match, current wisdom is that the 1972 Fischer would be slaughtered by the likes of Anand, Topalov etc. It looks to me like this is simply incorrect.
I just don't know what significance these figures have when trying to detect cheats on this site. At the very least they prove that >90% matc ave longer to think about their moves but will often have dozens of games on the go at once.
Higher matchup may not always mean "better play". For example in 1st game of their match Fisher lost but his matchup was higher. Also when higher matchup is result of better quality you should also take into account your opponent`s strenght - its easier to play good against weaker players. So I doubt if Fisher would reach such a matchup (and quality) against modern GM`s.
At the very least they prove that >90% match-ups are possible in OTB games.
In round 11 it was Spassky who reached 100% matchup. And in few games Fisher have reached >90%. So I dont believe that matchup of single games can give overhelming evidence. Which can`t ber said about matchup of many games, selected by objective criteria (consecutivity, particular tournament,etc.)