Go back
Gambits

Gambits

Only Chess

z

127.0.0.1

Joined
27 Oct 05
Moves
158564
Clock
13 Apr 07
Vote Up
Vote Down

I'm just looking for new openings to spice up my play, please list em here.

Kings gambit
1. e4 e5 2. f4

Tennison Gambit
1. e4 d5 2. Nf3

Smith Morra Gambit
1. e4 c5 2. d4 cxd 3. c3

Latvian Gambit
1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 f5

Alekhine-Chatard Attack (my current favorite)
1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. Nc3 Nf6 4. Bg5 Be7 5. e5 Nfd7 6. h4

K
Demon Duck

of Doom!

Joined
20 Aug 06
Moves
20099
Clock
13 Apr 07
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by zebano
I'm just looking for new openings to spice up my play, please list em here.

Kings gambit
1. e4 e5 2. f4

Tennison Gambit
1. e4 d5 2. Nf3

Smith Morra Gambit
1. e4 c5 2. d4 cxd 3. c3

Latvian Gambit
1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 f5

Alekhine-Chatard Attack (my current favorite)
1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. Nc3 Nf6 4. Bg5 Be7 5. e5 Nfd7 6. h4
Reti Gambit
1. Nf3 d5 2. c4

OK, it doesn't feel like a real balls-out gambit but then the Benko Gambit doesn't either. I like that one as well.

Benko Gambit
1. d4 Nf3 2. c4 c5 3. d5 b5

ABC
Siachmat!

Porthmadog

Joined
12 May 06
Moves
17753
Clock
13 Apr 07
Vote Up
Vote Down

Evans Gambit: 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Bc5 4.b4

b
Best Loser

Traxler is Sound!

Joined
14 Nov 06
Moves
17862
Clock
13 Apr 07
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Ari Brenin Cymru
Evans Gambit: 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Bc5 4.b4
Yah that's an interesting gambit... seems completely unsound to me though.

S

Joined
14 Jul 06
Moves
20541
Clock
13 Apr 07
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by ih8sens
Yah that's an interesting gambit... seems completely unsound to me though.
Well it may seem unsound to you but it was good enough for Karsparov to beat Anand, Shirov to beat Timman & Short to beat Huebner to name a few obvious examples.

b
Best Loser

Traxler is Sound!

Joined
14 Nov 06
Moves
17862
Clock
13 Apr 07
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Squelchbelch
Well it may seem unsound to you but it was good enough for Karsparov to beat Anand, Shirov to beat Timman & Short to beat Huebner to name a few obvious examples.
Yah i know... btw, did you know gambits are for kids? (ask patzergrl)

P

Joined
29 Mar 07
Moves
2236
Clock
13 Apr 07
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by ih8sens
Yah i know... btw, did you know gambits are for kids? (ask patzergrl)
lol ask former world champion em lasker...

z

Joined
13 Apr 06
Moves
2683
Clock
13 Apr 07
Vote Up
Vote Down

How about proper chess? One does not need to play gambits to "spice up" your games, you can play solidly and still get good exciting games.

S

Joined
14 Jul 06
Moves
20541
Clock
13 Apr 07
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by ih8sens
Yah i know... btw, did you know gambits are for kids? (ask patzergrl)
I thought they were for fun!

Like any opening, a gambit is only worth playing if you understand what you're doing.
Take, for example the King's gambit. I can't play King's Bishop's because I just can't get my head around not being able to castle after 3...Qh4+
It doesn't feel right for me, though I know many people swear by it. King's knight's gambit just seems right to me & I understand it better.
I'd be foolish playing 3.Bc4 without studying it & would probably suffer badly.

A gambit played badly is just a material deficit in a defunct opening.
A gambit played well is magic!
Game 3023411

b
Best Loser

Traxler is Sound!

Joined
14 Nov 06
Moves
17862
Clock
13 Apr 07
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by z00t
How about proper chess? One does not need to play gambits to "spice up" your games, you can play solidly and still get good exciting games.
but up until the highest levels, almost everyone makes an imperfect move and gets beat up on when their opponents play good gambits.

Fritz beat me with the traxler gambit in 26 seconds in blitz last night.

z

127.0.0.1

Joined
27 Oct 05
Moves
158564
Clock
13 Apr 07
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by z00t
How about proper chess? One does not need to play gambits to "spice up" your games, you can play solidly and still get good exciting games.
No, one does not need to, but with the french and english as my main repitoire, the middlegames I reach are getting a bit stale. A few crazy games here and there adds some unusual positions to those middlegames.

c

Joined
02 Feb 06
Moves
8557
Clock
13 Apr 07
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by z00t
How about proper chess? One does not need to play gambits to "spice up" your games, you can play solidly and still get good exciting games.
Gambits are proper chess.

Z8

Joined
18 Feb 07
Moves
1345
Clock
13 Apr 07
Vote Up
Vote Down

Queen's Gambit perhaps? πŸ˜›

DD
Stealer of Souls

Waiting for You

Joined
16 Feb 07
Moves
119052
Clock
13 Apr 07
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by zebano
I'm just looking for new openings to spice up my play, please list em here.

Kings gambit
1. e4 e5 2. f4

Tennison Gambit
1. e4 d5 2. Nf3

Smith Morra Gambit
1. e4 c5 2. d4 cxd 3. c3

Latvian Gambit
1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 f5

Alekhine-Chatard Attack (my current favorite)
1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. Nc3 Nf6 4. Bg5 Be7 5. e5 Nfd7 6. h4
Danish Gambit. 1.e4 e5 2.d4 exd4 3.c3 dxc3 4.Bc4! cxb2 5.Bxb2. πŸ˜‰

S

Joined
14 Jul 06
Moves
20541
Clock
13 Apr 07
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Zander 88
Queen's Gambit perhaps? πŸ˜›
That doesn't count.

1.d4...d5
2.e4! does thoughπŸ˜‰

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.