1 edit
I just finished watching this, gary lost his 6th game to deep blue and the computer was still using book moves. If Gary Kasparov can lose to a database it just shows how much advantage a db is.
Without a doubt gary is the worlds best player ever, which shows having a pre-written battle plan or in this case every plan known and invented by man is a huge advantage.
Originally posted by CenterNutOne could argue that this shows he simply gave up, following his mistrust of the IBM team and subsequent frustration.
I just finished watching this, gary lost his 6th game to deep blue and the computer was still using book moves. If Gary Kasparov can lose to a database it just shows how much advantage a db is.
Without a doubt gary is the worlds best player ever, which shows having a pre-written battle plan or in this case every plan known and invented by man is a huge advantage.
Originally posted by CenterNutPlease limit your insipid database theory to one thread, CentreNut; I am developing an eye tick.
I just finished watching this, gary lost his 6th game to deep blue and the computer was still using book moves. If Gary Kasparov can lose to a database it just shows how much advantage a db is.
Without a doubt gary is the worlds best player ever, which shows having a pre-written battle plan or in this case every plan known and invented by man is a huge advantage.
Originally posted by CenterNutYou remind me of a basketballer who refuses to use his hands and only bounces the ball with his head, and then calls everyone else cheaters cos they use their hands.
I just finished watching this, gary lost his 6th game to deep blue and the computer was still using book moves. If Gary Kasparov can lose to a database it just shows how much advantage a db is.
Without a doubt gary is the worlds best player ever, which shows having a pre-written battle plan or in this case every plan known and invented by man is a huge advantage.
Play the game according to the rules. If you want to give yourself a disadvantage by not playing by the rules, then correspondence chess players should be calling you an idi ot instead of you calling them cheats.
D
Originally posted by RagnorakYeah! OMG I can't belive he managed to pollute THIS thread as well.
You remind me of a basketballer who refuses to use his hands and only bounces the ball with his head, and then calls everyone else cheaters cos they use their hands.
Play the game according to the rules. If you want to give yourself a disadvantage by not playing by the rules, then correspondence chess players should be calling you an idi ot instead of you calling them cheats.
D