Originally posted by sasquatch672Oh, common. There is no one on this site whose level of play matches that of a top computer engine. The opponents who confuse me with a chess computer have to catch up with the times. I'd be hard pressed to find a chess engine that played as poorly as I do on its top level.
YO!!! You just told me my chess sucks! What gives man!
I just want to say that everyone who has beaten me has used a computer. Not just an ordinary one. The one at Cal Tech, grinding away 24 hours a day with the sole purpose of finding the optimum moves to frustrate my plans. I'm glad to say I have been able to beat the transistor behemoth a few times, but still I have suffered under this crushing electronic disadvantage for too many months. I have brought this to Russ's attention, and he has assured me that his representatives are infiltrating the labyrinthine plot. In a short time the culprits will be exposed in an RHP post. Some of the names will surprise you, but some, of course, some are already well known.
Originally posted by sasquatch672Originally posted by sasquatch672
YO!!! You just told me my chess sucks! What gives man!
YO!!! You just told me my chess sucks! What gives man!
Maybe I should rephrase 🙂 All of our chess sucks versus most computers. My games could only be confused with that of an old Commodore 64 running on a couple of D batteries.
Game 1058652
Look at Black on move 20. You had Mate in 1 and missed it.
Certainly not a computer's doing.
Bryan
Originally posted by ChessNutSasq,
Game 1058652
Look at Black on move 20. You had Mate in 1 and missed it.
Certainly not a computer's doing.
Bryan
I read my post again and it sounded like I was poking fun and that was not what I meant. We all miss stuff like that but a computer wouldn't is all I meant.
Bryan