Originally posted by alexstclaireWho here cares?
seriously, he deserves another star, for being the most active player in the history of the site by a long way, this may have been brought up before, but who here agrees!!!!!?
Not trying to be (very) mean, but he hasn't complained, so why are you?
Originally posted by cmsMasterone of the purposes of this thread is to find out who cares, so your first question is quite unneccesary and insipid. Your intentions are not important to me, you were rude but youre not important to me either, so im not hurt. Im not complaining, merely proposing a suggestion. Is there anything you'd like to say that I could shove back down your throat, if there is, post a comment similar to the one I am replying in regard to.
Who here cares?
Not trying to be (very) mean, but he hasn't complained, so why are you?
Originally posted by cmsMasterDude you did this in another thread that i started. i just don't see why you would have a problem with somone for congradulating another player for being so active. obviously you don't care, but no one really asked if you didn't care. Hes just trying to congradulate a player for being so active. Let him do that.
Who here cares?
Not trying to be (very) mean, but he hasn't complained, so why are you?
This is the question of quality or quantity.
Helden is still, after 8688 games, at a rating of only 1296. Only 96 points more than when he entered.
If he gave every move a more of a thought then he would have much higher rating.
If I would give someone two stars, then it would be those of top 30 on the list of highest rating with Akizy at the very top.
Originally posted by alexstclairethe dude did say he's not trying to be mean. most of us probably don't care how many games someone has. good job and all that, but why should we care? many of us use more time daily than him on a handful of games. I bet the higher your rating, the more you tend to use time on your tough games. if you follow a game in progress between the top dogs, they move excruciatingly slow.
one of the purposes of this thread is to find out who cares, so your first question is quite unneccesary and insipid. Your intentions are not important to me, you were rude but youre not important to me either, so im not hurt.
Originally posted by wormwoodand i said i dont care what he was trying to do, his intentions arent important....if you dont care then dont post, obviously by posting you have some sort of interest in the matter, the better way to go about it would be to simply let the thread go to the bottum, some people cant get a higher rating so you should at least reword someone for spending the most time here. I think the top 30 could get there own star as well, that was a good idea.
the dude did say he's not trying to be mean. most of us probably don't care how many games someone has. good job and all that, but why should we care? many of us use more time daily than him on a handful of games. I bet the higher your rating, the more you tend to use time on your tough games. if you follow a game in progress between the top dogs, they move excruciatingly slow.
please people think before you post, dont use all your brains for chess
Originally posted by FabianFnashighest rating: akizy (by 45 points, quite a long way)
This is the question of quality or quantity.
Helden is still, after 8688 games, at a rating of only 1296. Only 96 points more than when he entered.
If he gave every move a more of a thought then he would have much higher rating.
If I would give someone two stars, then it would be those of top 30 on the list of highest rating with Akizy at the very top.
most moves ever in the top 100 plyers: GauravV (by a long way)
most active top 100 player in the last month: EveRyDay (by a long long way)
most active player ever: helden (by a long way)