25 Jan '07 22:13>
This is not one of the "why don't you resgin you @½#½$#>$½{ patzers!!" threads, believe me. I am asking this out of pure curiosity.
Imagine you are playing a game where everything went wrong. You've just lost a pawn for no compensation, every single enemy piece is pointing at your shieldless King, and deep inside you know all is over.
Would you resign?
I mean, I believe it is completely pointless to continue a game which is clearly lost. Even 1000 players don't blunder the game away in such situations. OTB, I usually resign when there is a gross material disadvantage. I am depressed in such situations, and I just do not want to see my opponet shoot a "ha, I beat you!" look to me all the time.
I enjoy people who do not give up though. OTB, they do it just beacuse they want to irritate the opponent, a weak attempt to save their ego. They think of chess as a way to convince others that they are smarter than all. I find it disrespectful, and punish them by glaring incessantly at them and checkmating them slooooowly.
QandK vs K situations are fine with me if my opponent has 30 seconds in his clock, though. I am sure everybody will agree me on this. Feel free to post if you don't, though 😛
The question is not "shouldn't they resign?" but "should we resign?"
Imagine you are playing a game where everything went wrong. You've just lost a pawn for no compensation, every single enemy piece is pointing at your shieldless King, and deep inside you know all is over.
Would you resign?
I mean, I believe it is completely pointless to continue a game which is clearly lost. Even 1000 players don't blunder the game away in such situations. OTB, I usually resign when there is a gross material disadvantage. I am depressed in such situations, and I just do not want to see my opponet shoot a "ha, I beat you!" look to me all the time.
I enjoy people who do not give up though. OTB, they do it just beacuse they want to irritate the opponent, a weak attempt to save their ego. They think of chess as a way to convince others that they are smarter than all. I find it disrespectful, and punish them by glaring incessantly at them and checkmating them slooooowly.
QandK vs K situations are fine with me if my opponent has 30 seconds in his clock, though. I am sure everybody will agree me on this. Feel free to post if you don't, though 😛
The question is not "shouldn't they resign?" but "should we resign?"