20 Jul '11 05:09>
What did you get out of the book? How did you approach reading the book? 🙂
thanks
thanks
Originally posted by vishyanandYes, I have read the book, loaned it to a friend, then released it into the universe along with a large number of other chess books that I felt unnecessary to keep.
What did you get out of the book? How did you approach reading the book? 🙂
thanks
Originally posted by greenpawn34Yeah - when I was in the range of 12-15 years old, I noticed that my results went down as I tried to incorporate more positional play in my chess. It seems I would concentrate so much on the positional part of the game, I'd overlook obvious tactics. And probably I wasn't making as good as "positional" choices as I thought, too.
Reading these 'advanced' books can screw up weaker players
who have been convinced and ill advised that there is more to chess
than what there actually is.
...
Originally posted by greenpawn34His problem is not understanding the point of doubling somebody's pawns. Its all about weakness... you take time to double your opponents pawns if you can attack them. If he went about it this way he would have realized that e5,f7 and c6 were THE attackable weak points which he actually helped strengthen by trying to double pawns. When I look at the board I think "Where can I infiltrate" if I can't find an available "infiltratio zone" I try to figure out where to create one. I keep in mind bad pieces and doubled, isolated, weak pawns as the tools to create or recognize "infiltration zones"
Reading these 'advanced' books can screw up weaker players
who have been convinced and ill advised that there is more to chess
than what there actually is.
By coincidence I was talking to an OTB 1200 player today who played
in a recent under 1400 tournament.
I saw his game and in this position (he was White.)
[fen]r1bk1b1r/2p2ppp/p1p2n2/4p3/4P ...[text shortened]... apricot.com/scottish/2011/minorb/tfd.htm
Look at Burns v Duff 2nd from the bottom.