Originally posted by kmac27Can't learn to much from that huh?
http://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1361577
craziest opening i have seen.
That's why I like looking at old master games. They are simple to follow and the plans don't change much during the game.
I can see why some GM's recommend studying old master games besides new gm games.
The post that was quoted here has been removedDragon isn't refuted either. 😛
I was just joking around, but in all seriousness I'd steer clear of the Najdorf/Schev. until at least 1650 - There are far better choices in the Sicilian for amateurs that get overlooked often, the one that I think has the most potential and smallest following at our level is the Taimanov. It's super solid, seems rather tactical, and the lines are almost completely unknown at even my level (1650 PC, 1620 here).