Go back
How do you know someone is cheating??

How do you know someone is cheating??

Only Chess

Vote Up
Vote Down

I am new to the site and I heard about all this Soul Saxy business.
I want to know how to detect whether someone is cheating or not, it drives me nuts!!

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by trailblazers35
I am new to the site and I heard about all this Soul Saxy business.
I want to know how to detect whether someone is cheating or not, it drives me nuts!!
Are you playing anybody with a rating above 1800? If not, then it's pretty unlikely that anyone is cheating (using a program which makes theoretically the best move).

Vote Up
Vote Down

I've been playing a long time and SoulSaxy fooled me, maybe because i'm pretty trusting. Some of the cheaters are members, some are not. Some message a lot, some not at all. I guess if you asked a cheater something like, "What do you think of the Morphy Defence in the Evan's Gambit?" and he was a moron just copying moves from Fritz he would have trouble or at least have to do some actual work to find out. What you need is an engine to analyze his (or her) replies against a variety of engines to see what percentage of matches you get. But i can't be bothered so i just play as if everyone were honest.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Ramned
Are you playing anybody with a rating above 1800? If not, then it's pretty unlikely that anyone is cheating (using a program which makes theoretically the best move).
All engine users start playing here at 1200 - are you trying to tell us that they don't start cheating until they get to about 1800? lol.


Thread 72203 😉

Vote Up
Vote Down

Anyone I can't beat I assume is cheating.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by buddy2
I've been playing a long time and SoulSaxy fooled me, maybe because i'm pretty trusting. Some of the cheaters are members, some are not. Some message a lot, some not at all. I guess if you asked a cheater something like, "What do you think of the Morphy Defence in the Evan's Gambit?" and he was a moron just copying moves from Fritz he would have trouble or ...[text shortened]... ge of matches you get. But i can't be bothered so i just play as if everyone were honest.
You know what? my rating is 1948 now, and i dont know the name of openings, this dont mean anything. I only know few name and not even sure, but i know how to play it. It not about knowing opening name. I take so much time to play one move, maybe even more than 15 mins this why i have very less gameload with me, and reducing.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Vladimir
Anyone I can't beat I assume is cheating.
There must be a hell of a lot of cheats out there then 😉

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by buddy2
I've been playing a long time and SoulSaxy fooled me, maybe because i'm pretty trusting. Some of the cheaters are members, some are not. Some message a lot, some not at all. I guess if you asked a cheater something like, "What do you think of the Morphy Defence in the Evan's Gambit?" and he was a moron just copying moves from Fritz he would have trouble or ...[text shortened]... ge of matches you get. But i can't be bothered so i just play as if everyone were honest.
If you are going to compare moves to the response of an engine make sure you do so AFTER the game has finished. If not, you are just as likely to be banned as the suspected cheat. More so if you admit to such practices in here!

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Vladimir
Anyone I can't beat I assume is cheating.
Or is better at it than you.🙄

Vote Up
Vote Down

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Dr Strangelove
All engine users start playing here at 1200 - are you trying to tell us that they don't start cheating until they get to about 1800? lol.
look up the word "likely."

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Ramned
look up the word "likely."
I don't have to - I know what "likely" means.

I can guarantee all the banned engine users were once below 1800 so it's not really unlikely. In fact I would say it is VERY likely that there are plenty more. It would be naive to think otherwise. They just don't look so suspicious till they get to 2000 or so..

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Dr Strangelove
I don't have to - I know what "likely" means.

I can guarantee all the banned engine users were once below 1800 so it's not really unlikely. In fact I would say it is VERY likely that there are plenty more. It would be naive to think otherwise. They just don't look so suspicious till they get to 2000 or so..
do you know what "wiggling" means?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by wormwood
do you know what "wiggling" means?
Hmm. I don't know. I don't know what likely means either, that's why I asked. 🙄