Originally posted by ivan2908
What do you think about Silman's endgame course if you saw it ?
Silman covers much of the same material that Paul Keres covers in his book, but it is easy to understand. However, Silman is writing for the market. His material is designed for players less than 2000. I agree he has chapters dedicated to 2000-2200 and above 2200, but the build of the content is for lower rated players.
The most memorable parts of Paul Keres book are his presentation of studeies, like Philidors', showing their conclusions, and disproving them. That shows his genius.
Mark Dvoretsky is probably the greatest trainer in histroy, but his material is deep and not easy to understand the first time through. The series School of Chess Excellence is much better written that his previous work. Of course, Technique for the Touranment Player is one of the sacred bibles of chess.
Silman's novel approach at categorizing material by rating is unsurpassed. All chess book now need to be written this way.
But, you know, I still carry Chernev's Practical Chess Endings with me everywhere I go. If I'm at a stop light, in a doctor's office, or catch a break at work I find myself still reading his book.
Back to your question, I think all chess players should own a copy of Silman's Complete Endgame Course. It is better written than How to Reassess Your Chess and the Amateur's Mind. As he gets older his books get better, and his publishing get better too. I really enjoyed Chess Digest when it was in publication, but as a publishing company for chess books it sucks. Silmans work in his first endgame book was good, but the publishing was not. He has admitted that he only did it for the money.
One more thing ... Silman is still someone I would like to meet before I die (Jim Dandy's on that list too -- nothing to do with chess, but some great early rock 'n roll, BOA, Black Oak Arkansas).