I am still missing 4 more tests but till now I have realizaed that some positions wich I thougt I had under control, I really didnt, and I will study this positions again in order to dominate them.
I recomend this test to anybody below 1500 here and would like to check resuls with some of you to compare them to your rating here on RHP, to check the acuracy with both ratings, I am sure you will find it very usefull as I did.
I am unwothy, no wonder I am 1400, now I fully understand it, and will work on it to be better!!!!!
I am still missing 4 more tests but till now ...[text shortened]... m unwothy, no wonder I am 1400, now I fully understand it, and will work on it to be better!!!!!
yeah the test is weird...
here's my result, I only took 3 exams
Endings II 1568
Strategy II 1614
Strategy III 1527
i do better when i play a realistic game rather than puzzles...
Pandolfini is unworthy, too! I was stumped on this problem, so I plugged it into Fritz to see the solution:
He gives 1.f4! a5 2.fxg5? a4 3.Kg3 a3 4.Kh4 a2 5.g3, with a draw by stalemate. However, White has 2.h4! and he can promote a pawn with check on the g-file. He emerges with a pawn or two ahead, and thus has all the winning chances.
Originally posted by krim I found that test ridiculous as a ratings exam.
Maybe as a rating exam it is, but it helps you know about some basic aspects of the game that you should master and you dont, I found that I thougt I could solve some easy problems yet I could not