19 Aug '08 17:59>1 edit
This is the perennial problem: I'm totally dissatisfied with everything that black has for e4. I've tried various versions of the sicilian, but tend to get eaten alive by early attacks. I've tried alekhine's, but it seems to either lead to a mass of piece trades and a boring, inferior, endgame or me never being able to dent white's pawn center. The Caro is hopeless -- I lose practically instantly whenever I play any variation of it.
This can't be a general problem, e.g., tactical deficiency, because I don't have nearly as bad results as white even in highly tactical openings (my main opening as white is, after all, the KG) or as black vs. d4.
I'm considering:
- the latvian gambit. Pros: it's just my style. Cons: have to actually learn lots of theory or spend huge amounts of time calculating lines right from the start, or die on spot.
- Some other bloody e5 thing. Pros: I haven't played the ruy, petrof, etc., for years and years. Maybe it'll be interesting. Cons: I remember hating the ruy, petrof, etc. when I did play them, plus gives white too much control over where things go, again will have to learn scads of theory.
- Pirc. Pros: it seems to generally go along with my style -- I've found that the kings indian makes me quite happy as black, for example. Cons: isn't it basically busted? Plus, I always see obnoxious streetcorner blitz players playing this, and it annoys me.
-French. Pros: I always have trouble beating it (avoiding the french is the main reason I adopted the KIA as white against non e5 openings). Cons: it's for sissies, I hate closed centers and stupid battles over central pawns.
- Scandie: Pros: see French. Cons: it can't be good. Really.
Your wisdom? I'm thinking maybe one of those obnoxious gambit versions of the scandie?
This can't be a general problem, e.g., tactical deficiency, because I don't have nearly as bad results as white even in highly tactical openings (my main opening as white is, after all, the KG) or as black vs. d4.
I'm considering:
- the latvian gambit. Pros: it's just my style. Cons: have to actually learn lots of theory or spend huge amounts of time calculating lines right from the start, or die on spot.
- Some other bloody e5 thing. Pros: I haven't played the ruy, petrof, etc., for years and years. Maybe it'll be interesting. Cons: I remember hating the ruy, petrof, etc. when I did play them, plus gives white too much control over where things go, again will have to learn scads of theory.
- Pirc. Pros: it seems to generally go along with my style -- I've found that the kings indian makes me quite happy as black, for example. Cons: isn't it basically busted? Plus, I always see obnoxious streetcorner blitz players playing this, and it annoys me.
-French. Pros: I always have trouble beating it (avoiding the french is the main reason I adopted the KIA as white against non e5 openings). Cons: it's for sissies, I hate closed centers and stupid battles over central pawns.
- Scandie: Pros: see French. Cons: it can't be good. Really.
Your wisdom? I'm thinking maybe one of those obnoxious gambit versions of the scandie?