10 Sep 06
Originally posted by cmsMasterCome on guys! NOBODY CAN DISCUSS A GAME IN PROGRESS!
Ok Tony, this game's so well played for both sides that it's hard to find the errors that gave Tebb the advantage. I do have one question though. What is the reasoning behind 29...Rxd4 instead of the more obvious looking 29...Rc4?
BTW:I'm well aware that you're much better than me. So any analysis I have will probably be refuted by you anyway. 😛
Period!
- Joined
- 26 May 02
- Moves
- 72546
10 Sep 06
Originally posted by arrakisTony probably forgot to mention that the game we're currently playing is unrated. So on this particular occasion, I don't mind if people make comments, especially about the opening.
Come on guys! NOBODY CAN DISCUSS A GAME IN PROGRESS!
Period!
But as a general rule I agree with Arrakis that people shouldn't discuss games which are in progress.
10 Sep 06
Originally posted by David TebbYes, I definitely forgot this. I also didn't think it was that big of a deal to discuss moves that have already been played, since there is no going back, but that's stupid. I should have just said nothing, since the games in progress.
Tony probably forgot to mention that the game we're currently playing is unrated. So on this particular occasion, I don't mind if people make comments, especially about the opening.
But as a general rule I agree with Arrakis that people shouldn't discuss games which are in progress.
10 Sep 06
1 edit
Here are two RHP (Or TIG thanks to the new scheme...) games that I played. The second one is called a "Richter-Rauzer" by F9, but I consider it a Dragon so 😛.
Game 2182571
Major errors in this game occur at moves 15.f4??, 18...Rd8??, and 19...Ng4? according to Fritz 9.
Game 2325819
Sorry my games aren't as awesome as Tony, and Xanthos', but I'm working on a couple that are pretty good 🙂. Give me some time! 😀
11 Sep 06
Originally posted by arrakisPersonally I think studying the games I posted where Tebb schooled me with both sides of the Dragon would be instructive. No1 claims that the Dragon is a cooked which I think is a gross over exaggeration.
Like I said, if you are serious about learning this line study his games...
12 Sep 06
Originally posted by Sicilian SmaugAnd I didn't play e6, which is why I call it a dragon. The position that I reach is strikingly similar to a Dragon, minus white's bishop on c4.
The 2nd one is a dragon, the Richter Rauzer starts:
1.e4 c5
2.Nf3 Nc6
3.d4 cd
4.Nxd4 Nf6
5.Nc3 d6
6.Bg5 e6
13 Sep 06
Originally posted by XanthosNZNo games against no1marauder?😛
For balance:
Don't do what XanthosNZ does.
Game 1503325
Game 1867225
Game 2142207
And something I've been toying with recently:
Game 1594573