Go back
Interesting Pirc Defense game...

Interesting Pirc Defense game...

Only Chess

Vote Up
Vote Down

I just won a very sharp game playing black in the Chinese Variation (5. g4) of the Pirc defense:
Game 1828192

I don't think my setup was particularly solid, though, so I'd like to ask for some comments on the game: do you see any improvements for my opponent that could have put me in a bad situation? Should I have played differently at some point?

I think 11. e5 instead of 11. f4 is worth a try, but I haven't analyzed it. What do you think?

Vote Up
Vote Down

11. f4 definately gives you the advantage. Like you said e5 would have been a good move, I also like Nf3.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Nf3 does look good. During the game I was thinking of either 11... a5 or 11... Bg4; probably the latter. I need to put pressure on white's central pawns somehow, otherwise I'll get crushed.

Vote Up
Vote Down

a5 is pretty good, he then should move e5 or could still do Nf3. Bg4 would be a mistake as that would give him a material edge. Did yout think about 11 ... Nh7?

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Balla88
a5 is pretty good, he then should move e5 or could still do Nf3. Bg4 would be a mistake as that would give him a material edge. Did yout think about 11 ... Nh7?
I meant 11. Nf3 Bg4; how does that lose material? I thought of Nh7, but I think it's way too slow and artificial. The knight is much more active on f6 - after 11. Nf3 Nh7 he could just retreat his bishop to e3 with some serious threats.

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Oh ok, I thought you meant 11. f4 Bg4. But after Nf3 it works. Like you said, it's a tough choice between a5 and Bg4. I'd probably move a5.

Vote Up
Vote Down

11. Nf3 a5 12. e5 dxe5 13. dxe5 Ng4 looks good for black, I guess. Any idea other than 12. e5?

Vote Up
Vote Down

I though Michas should have 0-0-0 first before starting the attack on your king. Don't got much time but this might help you. This is for different moves but the ideas are similar.

http://www.jeremysilman.com/chess_bits_pieces/040417_Martin_Something_Against_the_Pirc.html

Vote Up
Vote Down

I have been wondering why is g4 prefaced with Be2? Why not just skip the bishop move and play g4 a move earlier when you can then play Bd3 or be4 as suites the position (or even Bg2)?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by zebano
I have been wondering why is g4 prefaced with Be2? Why not just skip the bishop move and play g4 a move earlier when you can then play Bd3 or be4 as suites the position (or even Bg2)?
because ...Bxg4.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by RahimK
I though Michas should have 0-0-0 first before starting the attack on your king. Don't got much time but this might help you. This is for different moves but the ideas are similar.

http://www.jeremysilman.com/chess_bits_pieces/040417_Martin_Something_Against_the_Pirc.html
Thanks, that was an interesting read.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Regicidal
because ...Bxg4.
then Qxg4...

Vote Up
Vote Down

Then Nxg4.
🙄

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Heroic Metool
Thanks, that was an interesting read.
No problem, they also got other opening on that site as well and book reviews etc..