1. Standard membermchill
    Cryptic
    Behind the scenes
    Joined
    27 Jun '16
    Moves
    3077
    07 Mar '19 06:43
    For many years I've been reading occasional suggestions in chess publicans and even on this site that correspondence chess is somehow an inferior chess format, sorry, but I object to this. Time control and access chess literature is allowed in CC, but I think correspondence players work just as hard, and accomplish just as much as their OTB counterparts. In addition, I've found the additional time to analyze the positions deeper can make one a stronger player, which is why my OTB rating was roughly the same as my CC rating. This will no doubt be a subject of debate for many years to come, but I just cannot convince myself that because one travels to an OTB event and plays with shorter time controls that this somehow qualifies as a superior brand of chess.
  2. Subscribervenda
    Dave
    S.Yorks.England
    Joined
    18 Apr '10
    Moves
    83457
    07 Mar '19 14:15
    @mchill said
    For many years I've been reading occasional suggestions in chess publicans and even on this site that correspondence chess is somehow an inferior chess format, sorry, but I object to this. Time control and access chess literature is allowed in CC, but I think correspondence players work just as hard, and accomplish just as much as their OTB counterparts. In addition, I've foun ...[text shortened]... event and plays with shorter time controls that this somehow qualifies as a superior brand of chess.
    I think most would agree that playing OTB takes more skill than playing on here.
    One example would be the analyze board facility here which allows us to "work out" moves several moves in advance without having to visualise them mentally.
    In theory, although I suspect few us of us ever do you can "try" every possible realistic possible continuation(thousands of continuations are obviously no good so can be discounted immediately).
    Therefor it should be impossible for any of us to make a silly error on here although Greenpawns blogs show that we often do!!
    I find I make most mistakes when playing games similar to OTB conditions i.e. when a player is online at the same time and we are moving quickly.
    If I sit at the computer for hours analyzing each move exhaustively I'm sure I'd have more success.
    The truth of the matter is I play on here for enjoyment and relaxation so I'm never going to do that.
    In short CC chess is for fun, OTB is for competition
  3. Standard memberBigDogg
    Secret RHP coder
    on the payroll
    Joined
    26 Nov '04
    Moves
    155080
    07 Mar '19 19:13
    @venda said
    I think most would agree that playing OTB takes more skill than playing on here.
    One example would be the analyze board facility here which allows us to "work out" moves several moves in advance without having to visualise them mentally.
    In theory, although I suspect few us of us ever do you can "try" every possible realistic possible continuation(thousands of continuations a ...[text shortened]... and relaxation so I'm never going to do that.
    In short CC chess is for fun, OTB is for competition
    The skills are different. Correspondence chess is like an open-book test. In OTB you must rely on memory and calculate everything in your head.

    Either can be played as seriously, or casually, as the players wish.
  4. SubscriberPaul Leggett
    Chess Librarian
    The Stacks
    Joined
    21 Aug '09
    Moves
    113497
    08 Mar '19 21:02
    @mchill

    I think OTB HAS to be real chess, because the game almost certainly began life and took form with two guys, a board, and some pieces.

    There may or may not have been alcohol present.

    The books, postage stamps, databases, and email all came later. Much later, in some cases.
  5. Subscribersonhouse
    Fast and Curious
    slatington, pa, usa
    Joined
    28 Dec '04
    Moves
    53223
    08 Mar '19 21:24
    @Paul-Leggett
    Alcohol or shrooms😉
  6. Joined
    28 Feb '19
    Moves
    4750
    11 Mar '19 21:47
    OTB tournament chess is the true chess.
    Correspondence chess is serious and hard and I prefer it but tournament chess is better and harder in so many ways.
  7. Joined
    17 Nov '11
    Moves
    892
    20 Mar '19 11:02
    @mchill

    Thanks for your post, I agree with you.
    By the way, I got a highest rating OTB (in the US chess federation) of 1820.
    How would that compare with CC chess? I guess it depends on the effort you make checking opening books and analyzing. I am relatively new at CC chess...
  8. Joined
    28 Feb '19
    Moves
    4750
    20 Mar '19 11:10
    1820 in real OTB?
    You could be 2000 online.
  9. Joined
    17 Nov '11
    Moves
    892
    20 Mar '19 17:59
    @Rowin-Side

    thank you
    yes I was 1820, my highest rating, in OTB tournaments in New York but soon went into 1750's; it was difficult to keep it up
  10. Joined
    06 May '15
    Moves
    27373
    21 Mar '19 05:50

    Removed by poster

  11. Joined
    15 Feb '19
    Moves
    6325
    21 Mar '19 13:48

    Removed by poster

  12. SubscriberPaul Leggett
    Chess Librarian
    The Stacks
    Joined
    21 Aug '09
    Moves
    113497
    08 Apr '19 20:34
    @sonhouse said
    @Paul-Leggett
    Alcohol or shrooms😉
    Don't even go there, unless you brought enough to share with everyone.
  13. Subscribermoonbus
    Über-Nerd
    Joined
    31 May '12
    Moves
    8144
    09 Apr '19 15:261 edit
    @paul-leggett said
    @mchill

    I think OTB HAS to be real chess, because the game almost certainly began life and took form with two guys, a board, and some pieces.

    There may or may not have been alcohol present.

    The books, postage stamps, databases, and email all came later. Much later, in some cases.
    I guess it depends on what you mean by “real.” CC requires different skills than OTB, but not less strenuous. If one is going to play serious CC, one does research, needs either a good working private library or access to one (bricks and mortar or online databases), one has the opportunity to replay previous master game strategies and try out exotic opening variations one would never remember OTB. Certainly OTB came first, just as Socrates posing questions out loud came before Plato’s written treatises; they are both legitimate forms of philosophizing.
  14. Joined
    23 Apr '19
    Moves
    30
    24 Apr '19 05:41
    @mchill
    I've played OTB for over 40 years and have never heard an OTB player describe correspondance chess as inferior.
    I think perhaps that came about since some correspondance chess allows computer analysis.
    Not sure if this site allows it. I only recently joined, and didn't realise it was a correspondance chess website.
    -I had googled for a chess forum, and got a link directly to the forum section, and I signed up from there.
    So its the first time for me to play correspondence chess.
Back to Top

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.I Agree