1. Standard memberSwissGambit
    Caninus Interruptus
    2014.05.01
    Joined
    11 Apr '07
    Moves
    92274
    19 Nov '11 03:071 edit
    Originally posted by skeeter
    You're not listening - you can't drive the Rook off the eighth with the King on that side of the Rook and the Bishop is not correct.

    skeeter
    I guess I'm stuck with PaulLeggett then - if

    Black can just play ...Rc8 and ...Rg8 ad infinitum

    Edit: and Rd8+, etc.
  2. SubscriberPaul Leggett
    Chess Librarian
    The Stacks
    Joined
    21 Aug '09
    Moves
    113572
    19 Nov '11 03:07
    Originally posted by skeeter
    No. I've already given you the tactics - K & R to the seventh and with the correct placement of the Bishop, you can force the black King off the 8th, and effect the promotion. It is there but you have to work it through yourself. No pain - no gain.

    skeeter
    I'm sorry, but I can't prove a negative, and I do not think it is forced.

    If the white rook is on the 7th, the white king can't capture the black rook on c8, d8 or e8 without it being an immediate stalemate. I think I could draw this, in the absence of proof to the contrary. And I would have no problem being corrected, as I would learn from it!
  3. SubscriberPaul Leggett
    Chess Librarian
    The Stacks
    Joined
    21 Aug '09
    Moves
    113572
    19 Nov '11 03:08
    Originally posted by SwissGambit
    I guess I'm stuck with PaulLeggett then - if
    [fen]k1r5/P2K1R2/8/8/3B4/8/8/8 b - - 0 1[/fen]
    Black can just play ...Rc8 and ...Rg8 ad infinitum
    Even d8 and e8 are safe, as long as that white rook is on the 7th...
  4. Standard memberSwissGambit
    Caninus Interruptus
    2014.05.01
    Joined
    11 Apr '07
    Moves
    92274
    19 Nov '11 03:091 edit
    Originally posted by Paul Leggett
    Even d8 and e8 are safe, as long as that white rook is on the 7th...
    Ok, but even if the Rook was not on the 7th, Black still has two safe squares for the Rook.
  5. Standard memberSwissGambit
    Caninus Interruptus
    2014.05.01
    Joined
    11 Apr '07
    Moves
    92274
    19 Nov '11 03:20
    Originally posted by Paul Leggett
    I'm sorry, but I can't prove a negative, and I do not think it is forced.

    If the white rook is on the 7th, the white king can't capture the black rook on c8, d8 or e8 without it being an immediate stalemate. I think I could draw this, in the absence of proof to the contrary. And I would have no problem being corrected, as I would learn from it!
    http://www.k4it.de/index.php?topic=egtb&lang=en

    Set the position up here and see for yourself. The winning method involves white pitching his pawn for a won K+R+B v. K+R position.
  6. SubscriberPaul Leggett
    Chess Librarian
    The Stacks
    Joined
    21 Aug '09
    Moves
    113572
    19 Nov '11 03:29
    Originally posted by SwissGambit
    http://www.k4it.de/index.php?topic=egtb&lang=en

    Set the position up here and see for yourself. The winning method involves white pitching his pawn for a won K+R+B v. K+R position.
    Thanks-another lesson learned!
  7. Standard memberExuma
    Anansi
    Woodshed
    Joined
    16 Apr '07
    Moves
    35523
    19 Nov '11 03:49
    Originally posted by SwissGambit
    Ahh yes, I missed the desperado.
    Magic position number 1, getting the king up there.



    If black takes the pawn, its over like so...
  8. Standard memberExuma
    Anansi
    Woodshed
    Joined
    16 Apr '07
    Moves
    35523
    19 Nov '11 04:07
    Magic position number 2



    If black takes the pawn its mate with Ra5
  9. Standard memberExuma
    Anansi
    Woodshed
    Joined
    16 Apr '07
    Moves
    35523
    19 Nov '11 04:131 edit
    This is my new stuck point.


    !edit! if the king takes the pawn, kc6 seems good, but the king can escape by going to a6??
  10. Standard memberMarinkatomb
    wotagr8game
    tbc
    Joined
    18 Feb '04
    Moves
    61941
    19 Nov '11 11:36
    Originally posted by Exuma
    [fen]k5r1/P7/1B6/4R3/4K3/8/8/8 w - - 0 67[/fen]

    I can't see a way to make progress for white, and its the wrong bishop, and its a rook pawn. Is there something I'm clearly missing?
    According to shredder end game database (http://www.shredderchess.com/online-chess/online-databases/endgame-database.html) it's a win but you have to give up the pawn. I'll be honest with you, it's seriously technical!
  11. Standard memberExuma
    Anansi
    Woodshed
    Joined
    16 Apr '07
    Moves
    35523
    19 Nov '11 21:39

    This post is unavailable.

    Please refer to our posting guidelines.

  12. Standard memberExuma
    Anansi
    Woodshed
    Joined
    16 Apr '07
    Moves
    35523
    19 Nov '11 21:39

    This post is unavailable.

    Please refer to our posting guidelines.

  13. Standard memberExuma
    Anansi
    Woodshed
    Joined
    16 Apr '07
    Moves
    35523
    19 Nov '11 21:39

    This post is unavailable.

    Please refer to our posting guidelines.

  14. Standard memberExuma
    Anansi
    Woodshed
    Joined
    16 Apr '07
    Moves
    35523
    19 Nov '11 21:39
    Originally posted by Marinkatomb
    According to shredder end game database (http://www.shredderchess.com/online-chess/online-databases/endgame-database.html) it's a win but you have to give up the pawn. I'll be honest with you, it's seriously technical!
    I hear you! The hardest part is not understanding when and why I need a "waiting" move, or one of the rooks just moves up or down a file. Where does the bishop need to be in order to block a check? I need a better understanding of the ideas, in order to make the plan. I'm still trying to figure a way to get to Skeeter's original tactical position without stalemating or allowing the desperado checks (I like that term SG!)
  15. Standard memberChessPraxis
    Cowboy From Hell
    American West
    Joined
    19 Apr '10
    Moves
    55013
    20 Nov '11 05:28
    Just as I thought, a draw. 😛
Back to Top

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.I Agree