Originally posted by wormwoodTogether with Playchess.com it makes a perfect combination ..... I look at and examine the information on Playchess.com and listen to the site you mention. Great !
here's the link for current game with some english commenting by seirawan:
http://www.spiegel.de/static/chessbase/index-en.html
Originally posted by gambit3Yep, when you have a chess program that looks at over 9 million positions per second, it isn't as if it can't think of a move when there are seconds to spare. 🙂
The only time I have seen Fritz lose on time was when there were other programs running on the computer. Chess programs generally never have time trouble.
It will always come up with something (bar other applications running, as you said). Whether it is a good move or not within the limited time is another matter.
Originally posted by omulcusobolaniIt looked like it on ICC, Fritz only had 5 minutes while Kramnik had 12 in a time control marked 120. The time was actualyl for the first control and was later updated at 40 moves. It also wasn't real time.
What time trouble? They reached move 40 and this position is a dead draw.
Originally posted by omulcusobolani[Event "Bonn"]
I think we'll see e5 with either a Petrov or a Ruy Lopez Berlin.
[Site "?"]
[Date "????.??.??"]
[Round "4"]
[White "Fritz 10"]
[Black "Kramnik"]
[Result "1/2-1/2"]
[ECO "C43"]
[PlyCount "108"]
1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nf6 3. d4 Nxe4 4. Bd3 d5 5. Nxe5 Nd7 6. Nxd7 Bxd7 7. O-O Bd6 8. Qh5 Qf6 9. Nc3 Qxd4 10. Nxd5 Bc6 11. Ne3 g6 12. Qh3 Ng5 13. Qg4 Qf4 14. Qxf4 Bxf4 15. Nc4 Ne6 16. Bxf4 Nxf4 17. Rfe1+ Kf8 18. Bf1 Bb5 19. a4 Ba6 20. b4 Bxc4 21. Bxc4 Rd8 22. Re4 Nh5 23. Rae1 Rd7 24. h3 Ng7 25. Re5 Nf5 26. Bb5 c6 27. Bd3 Nd6 28. g4 Kg7 29. f4 Rhd8 30. Kg2 Nc8 31. a5 Rd4 32. R5e4 Kf8 33. Kf3 h6 34. Rxd4 Rxd4 35. Re4 Rd6 36. Ke3 g5 37. Rd4 Ke7 38. c4 Rxd4 39. Kxd4 gxf4 40. Ke4 Kf6 41. Kxf4 Ne7 42. Be4 b6 43. c5 bxc5 44. bxc5 Ng6+ 45. Ke3 Ne7 46. Kd4 Ke6 47. Bf3 f5 48. Bd1 Kf6 49. Bc2 fxg4 50. hxg4 Ke6 51. Bb1 Kf6 52. Be4 Ke6 53. Bh1 Kf6 54. Bf3 Ke6
1/2-1/2
The Petrov has indeed been used against 1. e4 leading to another draw.