Originally posted by maxlange
This is actually very important. If you were able to break down my 2 simple positions or understand Swiss' class E position then we might be done with this by now. Go back and really think what would happen if each side were to move in both types of chess.
Chessic ability, of which you have no way of knowing what mine is, nor maybe I yours, has no bearing on the logicality of a set of rules. Mathematicians, Legislators, Philosophers, & Ethicists set up sets of rules & laws all the time on a widely varying range of subjects on which they could never be experts in all of. But that's why we have these people; they are able to see what is just or fair or logical or proper, partly without regard for expertise.
Do NASCAR drivers make the rules for their races? Let alone for our roads? For example, who made the current set of FIDE rules for Chess? Only the best players with the deepest understanding? Not hardly. For one thing, if they did, it would invalidate all of your arguments because I can safely assume you are not one of the top players on the planet as we speak. You play better than me and they play better than you. Does that make your opinion insignificant?
And yes, of your two simple positions, I initially got part of one wrong. I was tired, I misunderstood, and I was wrong. And I already admitted to it. You keep bringing it up as if you were the discoverer of fire. Get over it. I was the wrong one and I already have.
But, no, I didn't evaluate the stalemate conditions incorrectly. In one, the giver had more material, in the other, the receiver. Under the current rules each was a stalemate. And you say they are equal. I disagree. And under the proposed rules, they would still be stalemate, but the score would be different, .75-.25 favoring the giver, as opposed to the current .5-.5, regardless of material, which is funny, because it keeps getting said it would make the the game more materialistic, yet, stalemates would continue to happen on either side of a material inequality, only the scores would change. Nothing about actual moves would change. Possibly the motivations and therefore strategies *might*, but we currently have no way of knowing, as it hasn't been tested. And you're afraid to.