> "just to demonstrate your obvious lack of experience in this subtle art,"
Fine words from a 1600 patzer who has never heard of Petrosian. What is your rating at CTS, seeing your "experience" in this field would give you a rating higher than mine. Or on ICC/Playchess? INIT? 🙄
You did not even notice that Macpos sacs are unsound by his own admission. Perhaps those "winning with xyz" books you have been buying have been weakening you then? You could also do with a "trolling for noobs" so that you can troll more effectively.
Originally posted by robbie carrobie- Great game, thanks.
nope, my rating is 1612, please if you are gonna slight me, be accurate, and if you like i shall post some 'speculative sacs, made by Gms, which won them the game, speculative queen sacs if you like, therefore irrespective of my rating, it does not take a great stretch of the imagination to tell when someone is talking nonsense, but i really got bett ...[text shortened]... s a speculative sacrifice, of which, this, is as fine an example as i can show.
- How did it continue?
oh please, you all stop being so childish and start concentrating on the theme at hand (macpo's creative sacks) and stop nipping at each other. Do you think anyone cares about your striffle, you mihgt as well PM each other a time and date and settle it that way.
I will however, remain silent myself about macpo's sacks as I haven't got much of an ideia about what is going on in the games. Macpo's explanations would be heavily thanked 😉. As for myself, I've only made one of these kind of sacs, but the thrill of the moment was enough to create a special interest for the theme. I would post it, but it's too damn obvious. Let me finnish by congratulating macpo (and every other player who has loads of positional sacs on their reportoire) for his guts over the chessboard.
Originally posted by orion25Class, there are
I will however, remain silent myself about macpo's sacks as I haven't got much of an ideia about what is going on in the games. Macpo's explanations would be heavily thanked 😉.
a) Positional Sacs
b) Speculative Sacs
Which of the two do Macpos sacs fall in? A lollipop to the smartest kid.
Originally posted by CCNoobsorry to tell you, but the sac's I know are only divided in:
Class, there are
a) Positional Sacs
b) Speculative Sacs
Which of the two do Macpos sacs fall in? A lollipop to the smartest kid.
a)tactical sacs
b)positional sacs
any of these can sound or unsound, clear or not clear, speculative or not.
If you ask me, macpo's sacs are not tactical tricks, so they would be called positional sacs.
Originally posted by CCNoobif you ever actually post anything with content rather than abuse let us know, so that we may evaluate it, as it stands, your words amount to a center of a doughnut! and an unsubstantiated doughnut at that. Perhaps if we envisage Pertosian playing with doughnuts instead of pieces it may help you formulate something, who can tell? as for your rating, its no substitute for manners, nor for intelligence, but ill let your ego comfort you with those words - cya
> [b]"just to demonstrate your obvious lack of experience in this subtle art,"
Fine words from a 1600 patzer who has never heard of Petrosian. What is your rating at CTS, seeing your "experience" in this field would give you a rating higher than mine. Or on ICC/Playchess? INIT? 🙄
You did not even notice that Macpos sacs are unsound by his own admis n? You could also do with a "trolling for noobs" so that you can troll more effectively.[/b]
Originally posted by MetBierOpYes its a great game taken from my latest Patzer appealing book, winning with XYZ, 'Rampant chess', co written by our very own Greenpawn and Fide Master Keith Ruxton, foreword by GM Jonathan Rowson
- Great game, thanks.
- How did it continue?
here is the full game, i hope you enjoy,
J.Aagaard - E.Ubilava
Spanish team championship, 2007