Go back
Mate with two knights

Mate with two knights

Only Chess

W
Angler

River City

Joined
08 Dec 04
Moves
16907
Clock
09 Oct 07
Vote Up
Vote Down

We've discussed this topic several times, and this morning I came across this position from Znosko Borovsky - Seitz, Nice 1931

Black to move, mate in six

m

Joined
17 Dec 02
Moves
4144
Clock
09 Oct 07
Vote Up
Vote Down

I didn't think mate could be *forced* with just two knights. I'm guessing the white pawn is part of the reason it's forced in this puzzle?

z

Joined
02 Oct 07
Moves
5330
Clock
09 Oct 07
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

1... Kg4! 2. Kg1 (A) Kg3 3. Kh1 Nh4 4. f5 (B) Nf3 5. f6 Nd1/g4 6. f7 Nf2#

(A) 2. Kh1 Kg3 3. Kg1 Nh4 4. Kh1(C) Nf3 5. f5 Nd1/g4 6. f6 Nf2#

(B) 4. Kg1 Nf3+ 5. Kh1 Nd1/g4 6. f5 Nf2#

(C) 4. f5 Nf3+ 5. Kh1 Nd1/g4 6. f6 Nf2#

In words: After 1... Kg4! White's K gets trapped in the corner, gets stalemated and is forced to move his pawn while black proceeds to deliver mate.

DF
Lord of all beasts

searching for truth

Joined
06 Jun 06
Moves
30390
Clock
09 Oct 07
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by magnublm
I didn't think mate could be *forced* with just two knights. I'm guessing the white pawn is part of the reason it's forced in this puzzle?
Thats correct, mate can be forced with 2 knights when the weaker side has a pawn behind a certain place. This is because with the pawn stalemate can be avoided but the mate is horrendously complex and if anyone succeeds in doing it here they are probably using a tablebase.

F

Joined
11 Nov 05
Moves
43938
Clock
09 Oct 07
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Dragon Fire
Thats correct, mate can be forced with 2 knights when the weaker side has a pawn behind a certain place. This is because with the pawn stalemate can be avoided but the mate is horrendously complex and if anyone succeeds in doing it here they are probably using a tablebase.
Mate can be forced with only one knight with the aid of the opponents judas pawn.

z

Joined
02 Oct 07
Moves
5330
Clock
09 Oct 07
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Dragon Fire
Thats correct, mate can be forced with 2 knights when the weaker side has a pawn behind a certain place. This is because with the pawn stalemate can be avoided but the mate is horrendously complex and if anyone succeeds in doing it here they are probably using a tablebase.
I did most certainly not use a tablebase to arrive at the solution, just shuffling around some pieces. It's not that hard really.

W
Angler

River City

Joined
08 Dec 04
Moves
16907
Clock
09 Oct 07
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Dragon Fire
Thats correct, mate can be forced with 2 knights when the weaker side has a pawn behind a certain place. This is because with the pawn stalemate can be avoided but the mate is horrendously complex and if anyone succeeds in doing it here they are probably using a tablebase.
I created these tablebases when I was in eleventh grade three decades ago. Geez, there are only a few dozen possibilities in this position.

These are old-style Ruy Lopez type tablebases--using a quill pen, I list every possible white response to black's choice moves.

After 1...Kg4, white has two legal moves. In both cases 2...Kg3 forces the other, etc.

KC

Joined
13 Sep 07
Moves
3301
Clock
11 Oct 07
Vote Up
Vote Down

http://www.chess-poster.com/english/mail/mail_2006/mate_with_two_knights.htm

This site will sum it up nicely. The confusion about a mate with two knights is that it cannot be forced but it can happen with some help from your opponent.

w
Chocolate Expert

Cocoa Mountains

Joined
26 Nov 06
Moves
19249
Clock
11 Oct 07
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Karl Childers
...a mate with two knights...cannot be forced, but it can happen with some help from your opponent.
A mate with two knights alone cannot be forced. As this thread has mentioned, K+N+N can force mate against K+P.

DF
Lord of all beasts

searching for truth

Joined
06 Jun 06
Moves
30390
Clock
11 Oct 07
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by zzyw
I did most certainly not use a tablebase to arrive at the solution, just shuffling around some pieces. It's not that hard really.
The position given here is not difficult but most K & 2N vs K & P would require a tablebase to solve and if achieved in a nornal game here would be highly suspect.

DF
Lord of all beasts

searching for truth

Joined
06 Jun 06
Moves
30390
Clock
11 Oct 07
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Wulebgr
I created these tablebases when I was in eleventh grade three decades ago. Geez, there are only a few dozen possibilities in this position.

These are old-style Ruy Lopez type tablebases--using a quill pen, I list every possible white response to black's choice moves.

After 1...Kg4, white has two legal moves. In both cases 2...Kg3 forces the other, etc.
Sorry for confusion I did not mean this particular position which is indeed solvable but rather the sort of positions likely to occur in actual play which may have a forced mate is 40+ moves. It is these positions that I refer to as (probably) requiring a tablebase.

W
Angler

River City

Joined
08 Dec 04
Moves
16907
Clock
11 Oct 07
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Dragon Fire
Sorry for confusion I did not mean this particular position which is indeed solvable but rather the sort of positions likely to occur in actual play which may have a forced mate is 40+ moves. It is these positions that I refer to as (probably) requiring a tablebase.
Sorry I went after you as a rattlesnake, then.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.