It's the "Bible" of chess...although ECO has 5 volumes and has more
details...MCO is the best compact opening book. Way better than
Nunn's Chess Openings (NCO) or Standard Chess Openings by Schiller.
Dave, to be entirely honest with you and Shougi, I've never had the
opportunity to use the NCO. It seems, according to Randy, that both
have their merits, +s and -s. I have the MCO and appreciate Nick's et
al's work. There are drawbacks, though. E.g.: I like to play the
Scandinavian (Center Counter, as you call it over there) and the
Alekhine Defence. So far so good. But MCO does NOT give you an
answer when in the former your opponent doesn't play 2.exd5 and in
the latter 2.e5. You need a specific book on these openings then.
Why not giving just a few hints? Regards. Jan
is not the best reviewer in the world...I own NCO as well as MCO...and
I usually can find what I need in MCO...and if not..I have my
Informants...they are great for offbeat variations and things that you
cannot find in either.
But an specialized book on the opening is always the way to go.
i own both, and i personally look at NCO all the time. it has everything you
could want and a lot more than MCO. although either book is great, i prefer NCO
I have the MCO and the ECO (A, B, C, D and E). Don't think there's
any justification for having both NCO & MCO. Unless you've got money
to spend.
I just bought the Fritz Powerbook 2002. That's a great help (as an
encyplopaedia) with its 1,700,000 opening positions and 649,000
related games.
But still... understanding a few sound openings for both White and
Black seems to be the sensible goal to aim at. Jan
I agree that it is important to ahve a few sound openings in your
repertoire that you understand and where you feel good with. The rest
is a matter of time, effort and ambition. But certainly not a
replacement.