Go back
My Great Predecessors--Revisited

My Great Predecessors--Revisited

Only Chess

b

Hainesport, NJ, USA

Joined
22 Jun 04
Moves
17527
Clock
07 Jun 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Just completed my set of Kasparov's books by purchasing volume II from USCF for twelve bucks on sale. Fascinated by the game between Botvinnik and Fischer at the 1962 Olympiad. Kasparov gives the background of Botvinnik--a great teacher but a not very likeable person, staunch communist (unlike Kasparov himself), someone who had already declared that Fischer could never be world champion because he lacked "character." Versus the maniacally anti-communist, anti-Russian, and just plain maniac Fischer. This game is also covered in Fischer's My 60 Memorable Games. Kasparov adds Botvinnik's commentary as the game progresses and his own analysis. Fischer gains what he thinks is an unsuperable advantage from his Grunfeld, but Botvinnik fights on, analyzes into the night (with the help of a Russian team) until he reaches a paradoxical draw from the endgame. Crushed by his inability to wrest the win from his communist enemy, Fischer walks away with tears in his eyes. This isn't just chess, it's high drama and great entertainment. This series of books and chess literature is unrivalled by anything written on the subject. I can't think of anything else like it. Full of flaws and errors and of course not entirely written by the great K, these volumes offer the best history of chess in any language. Kudos to K.

T

Joined
20 Apr 06
Moves
465
Clock
07 Jun 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

nice review, now i want to read them. time to go to the bookstore i guess.

T

London

Joined
04 Jun 06
Moves
929
Clock
08 Jun 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

On the subject of predecessors, Kramnik gave an interesting interview here: http://www.kramnik.com/eng/interviews/getinterview.aspx?id=61

T

Joined
20 Apr 06
Moves
465
Clock
08 Jun 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

read it, pretty interesting, now ill think of those players styles a little differently.

z

127.0.0.1

Joined
27 Oct 05
Moves
158564
Clock
08 Jun 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by TommyC
On the subject of predecessors, Kramnik gave an interesting interview here: http://www.kramnik.com/eng/interviews/getinterview.aspx?id=61
Very interesting, thanks for the link.

T

London

Joined
04 Jun 06
Moves
929
Clock
08 Jun 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by TheDarkKnight
read it, pretty interesting, now ill think of those players styles a little differently.
I agree. Also Kramnik tends to link positional play with supersharp calculation of (often little) tactical lines, something I'd never thought of before, but which makes a lot of sense. His unfussed view of Botvinnik and identification of Karpov's main weakness as strategic (!) were also of particular surprise to me.

b

Hainesport, NJ, USA

Joined
22 Jun 04
Moves
17527
Clock
08 Jun 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Oh, by the way, speaking of errors. My book (vol 2 Great Predecessors) has the first move of the Botvinnik-Fischer game wrong. In my edition it has Botvinnik playing e4 instead of c4, which makes more sense cause it is a Grunfeld. But aside from the set having hundreds of errors, it still is a fantastic achievement and anybody who is interested in the development of chess must have it! Also, i understand K is revising it for a new edition. Probably he will clear up all these annoying errors.

p

Orlando, Florida

Joined
20 Jul 05
Moves
14752
Clock
08 Jun 06
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by TommyC
On the subject of predecessors, Kramnik gave an interesting interview here: http://www.kramnik.com/eng/interviews/getinterview.aspx?id=61
Thanks for the link!!

EDIT: rec'd

T

London

Joined
04 Jun 06
Moves
929
Clock
08 Jun 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by point
Thanks for the link!!

EDIT: rec'd
Welcome.

I've not read Kasparov's books, but from those who have I would be interested to know whether his opinions tally with Kramnik's - anyone?

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.