Go back
Najdorf or Dragon?

Najdorf or Dragon?

Only Chess

Vote Up
Vote Down

Is one stronger than the other, or is it just a matter of personal style. I like the Najdorf a lot. I guess it's because my bishops are maybe a little more unpredictable than in the Dragon. I tend to like that dark-squared bishop as an attacking piece. On the other hand, I am a patzer, and I have noticed that a lot of strong players swear by the Dragon. Is there a reason for this?

Vote Up
Vote Down

just go for the french

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Najdorf should be better. Of course, you could always go for Simon Williams' Dragadorf hybrid of the Najdorf and Dragon variations! (Can find this in his recent book and in an article he did in New In Chess Yearbook 76 a few years back.)

Vote Up
Vote Down

At the GM level, the Najdorf is much more popular and reliable. The Dragon is pretty easy to play against non-standard lines, though. I think this accounts for the popularity of the Dragon with some players. If you know it pretty well, you can score lots of points as black. In the Najdorf, if white just plays sensible development, its not quite as easy for black to get the advantage. Just my opinion.

Vote Up
Vote Down

At the amateur level, the dragon is popular because it's called "the dragon." At the super GM level, the Najdorf is popular because it scores better.

Unless you plan on taking on super GM's any time soon, the difference in reliability is trivial. One consideration is probably that OTB, the plans both for and against the dragon are much simpler.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by rking00
Is one stronger than the other, or is it just a matter of personal style. I like the Najdorf a lot. I guess it's because my bishops are maybe a little more unpredictable than in the Dragon. I tend to like that dark-squared bishop as an attacking piece. On the other hand, I am a patzer, and I have noticed that a lot of strong players swear by the Dragon. Is there a reason for this?
not really. either one will do fine. most people who prefer dragon probably like it because of its aggressiveness, and dynamism, which gives black chances. but najdorf is no ruy lopez either.

pick the one you feel more at home in.

Vote Up
Vote Down

You have to be a very good chess player to play the Najdorf.
and be prepared to make some pretty crazy looking moves and be on
the ball tactically. I mean really on the ball.

The score of quick wins v the Najdorf at the top level is incredible
one minor slip and there is no recovery - you lag so far behind in development
you get a tanking.

Most openings you can play yourself back into the game if you
make a wee error - with the Najdorf all you can hope for is that he
screws up the attack and facing a fully developed army that rarely happens.

The Dragon is easier to play (for both sides) - you have ready made
plans and know where your piece are going.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by orion25
just go for the french
LOL!!!!!!! Sound advice😀😀

Vote Up
Vote Down

Okay, this was my first serious attempt with the Najdorf. My opponent was rated about 400 pts. higher at the time, so I guess I was just happy to get through the opening in one piece. What GP says certainly applies to this game- I was lagging in development and had to play pretty creatively to avoid a quick loss. Unfortunately I proceeded to throw away any advantage I may have had by first making some risky pawn pushes in front of my king (I was desperate to avoid a back-rank mate) and of course dropping a knight didn't help either.


  • 8
  • a
  • 7
  • b
  • 6
  • c
  • 5
  • d
  • 4
  • e
  • 3
  • f
  • 2
  • g
  • 1
  • h
1.e4c5
2.Ng1f3d6
3.d4cxd4
4.Nf3xd4Ng8f6
5.Nb1c3a6
6.Bf1e2e5
7.Nd4b3Bf8e7
8.O-OO-O
9.a4Bc8e6
10.Be2f3Qd8d7
11.a5Rf8c8
12.Nc3a4Be7d8
13.Bc1e3Rc8c4
14.Na4b6Bd8xb6
15.Be3xb6Rc4b4
16.Rf1e1Qd7c6
17.Qd1d2Rb4b5
18.Ra1d1Nb8d7
19.Qd2xd6Qc6xc2
20.Nb3d2Nf6e8
21.Qd6e7Rb5xb2
22.Bb6e3Qc2c3
23.Nd2f1Qc3xa5
24.Nf1g3Qa5b5
25.Ng3h5Nd7f6
26.Be3c5h6
27.Qe7f8Kg8h7
28.Nh5xf6gxf6
29.Bc5e7Qb5a5
30.Bf3h5Ne8c7
31.Be7d8Qa5c3
32.Bh5xf7Ra8xd8
33.Qf8xd8Be6xf7
34.Qd8xf6Bf7e6
35.Re1e3Rb2d2
36.Rd1f1Rd2d3
37.Re3xd3Qc3xd3
38.Qf6e7Kh7g6
39.Qe7xc7Qd3xe4
40.f3Qe4d4
41.Kg1h1Qd4d5
42.Qc7b6Kg6f5
43.Rf1b1e4
44.fxe4Qd5xe4
45.Qb6xb7Be6d5
46.Qb7c8Kf5g5
47.Qc8d8Kg5h5
48.Rb1g1Qe4d4
49.Qd8e8Kh5g5
50.Qe8e7Kg5g6
51.Qe7d6Kg6g7
52.Qd6xa6Kg7h7
53.Qa6e2Qd4f6
54.Rg1f1Qf6g7
55.Qe2f2Bd5e4
56.h3h5
57.Kh1h2Qg7g5
58.Qf2f7

0

      Vote Up
      Vote Down

      I should also say that if I found the French enjoyable to play from either side, I would not have bothered starting this thread. 🙂

      Vote Up
      Vote Down

      Originally posted by rking00
      Okay, this was my first serious attempt with the Najdorf. My opponent was rated about 400 pts. higher at the time, so I guess I was just happy to get through the opening in one piece. What GP says certainly applies to this game- I was lagging in development and had to play pretty creatively to avoid a quick loss. Unfortunately I proceeded to throw away any a ...[text shortened]... f6g7 55. Qe2f2 Bd5e4 56. h3 h5
      57. Kh1h2 Qg7g5 58. Qf2f7 1-0 [/pgn]
      well just the beginning starting at move ten looks senseless. not bad but the queen's knight wanted to be on c5 and you played 10...Qd7 cramping it up. perhaps 10...b6 (to prevent a5) 11.Be3 then ...Nd7-c5. i'm no expert but i that knight ends up there often in the najdorf. it is well placed there and if white trades it off then black loses his backwards d pawn and gains the open d file. somebody correct me if i'm wrong there. also you missed an opportunity to win a pawn on move 13.

      1 edit
      Vote Up
      Vote Down

      I don't like e5. It leaves such a gaping weakness at d5. I play d6 instead.

      For move 11, develop the last Knight! Instead of finishing development (11...Nc6 12. Na4 Rad6) you ended up UNdeveloping the Bishop.

      I don't like 15...Rb4. You pull it off the open file for no real purpose that I csn tell. Eventually that Rook came under attack and then d6 which is where the Rook should be covering. Then of course you drop the Knight.

      Vote Up
      Vote Down

      Originally posted by AThousandYoung
      I don't like e5. It leaves such a gaping weakness at d5. I play d6 instead.

      For move 11, develop the last Knight! Instead of finishing development (11...Nc6 12. Na4 Rad6) you ended up UNdeveloping the Bishop.

      I don't like 15...Rb4. You pull it off the open file for no real purpose that I csn tell. Eventually that Rook came under attack and then d6 which is where the Rook should be covering. Then of course you drop the Knight.
      6. ... e5 is the main idea of the Najdorf and is the main line. Now we see the point of a6 (the Knight no longer has the b5 square available in addition to preparing the b7-b5 advance). There is only a hole on d5 if White can take advantage of it and this is not the case if Black plays properly at least in my experience. I take it you meant 6. ... e6 which leads to a Scheveningen which is also good, but I like e5 myself.

      After 10. Bf3 Qc7 is more in the spirit of the Najdorf I would think followed by Nbd7.

      Vote Up
      Vote Down

      Moves 10 - 15 all look pretty suspect for me, and some of the moves after too. What was the reasoning behind the weird looking 10...Qd7 instead of more natural moves like 10...Nc6 or 10...Nbd7? Playing simple moves like 10...Nbd7, 11...Qc7 and 12...Rac8 is likely to give you a decent position, although I'm no expert on the Najdorf.

      1 edit
      Vote Up
      Vote Down

      10 Bf3 looks odd to me, but the databases have it played almost a hundred times including by Bruzon against Anand at Leon 2006. Anand and the vast majority of other Najdorfers played Nbd7 and Qc7 in either order. That leads to the standard setup against the 6 Be2 Karpov line and prepares b5 if and when White plays a5.

      Rather unsurprisingly 10 ...... Qd7 was not played in any of these games; I too can't seem to fathom the reasoning behind it.

      Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.