Originally posted by Varenka
But we're in agreement that the higher he rises, the smaller the gains he gets from each win. So how is that a consistent rise? It's tapering off towards a gain of 0 points for a win.
You seem to be over looking one part of your statement.
" the higher he rises" this is an over inflating of his rating and actual talent. Which is what my post was about.
If this is still to inspecific for you to understand the concept behind the post i could go into mind numbing detail about the amount of increase he gains to his score over time. This is not what the post was about.
Not about the limit imposed by the calc, or even whether it is worthwhile to do this considering the deminishing returns. That is a personal judgement that each player has to make for themselves.
And MOST do not consider it worthwhile.
Try and take my use of the word "consistent" as a generalization of trend rather than specific detail.
Anything else you want to quibble about?