Originally posted by Fat Lady
I don't really understand the relevance of Nigel Short and other talented juniors. Short first qualified just before his 12th birthday and was 12 when he actually played in the Championship.
But, the thing is - he wasn't awarded a place in the Championship because he was a very strong prospect and the experience would be good for his chess development, h ...[text shortened]... ays". Presumably that's because the qualifying tournaments are weaker than they used to be.
JonathonB had supported the idea (or suggested idea) that the British championship be an elite 12 player all play all or something. I was a little annoyed at the seeming undermining of the British championship as it is, on the Streatham and Brixton blog a few weeks back. This was after I had come back from it, and was feeling quite exhausted from it.
So when I saw JonathonB posting again, in relation to the British championship, in relation to someone that qualified, I thought I should try and point out about the need to qualify for the event, and that might be seen in a positive light.
However, it is now apparent that perhaps the person in question didn't qualify by taking a high place in a tournament - or maybe he did in Wales?! Who knows?
Yes, I suppose the qualifier tournaments are becoming weaker - but perhaps this can now be seen as a great opportunity for players under 2300 to try and qualify more from the qualifier events. It is a shame that the OTB tournaments seem in decline - perhaps Southend is an example of that, where there were less titled players in the tournament I qualified from - the Southend open. It gave for me a special opportunity to play in the championship though - I just needed to beat FM ledger in the last round.
BTW, I spoke to Tim Kett at the British and he said he also represented Wales in the Olympiads - there are some benefits from being a strongish player in Wales 🙂