01 Aug '10 15:56>
Originally posted by greenpawn34Not to mention Nf6+, too.
...
I'd play Ne4 because instead of having just 2 threats for him to consider answering.
he now has four threats still in the position Nc5, Qc3, Qg3 and Bh6.
Originally posted by greenpawn34
That was one deep resignation.
White to play - Black's last move was 16...h6 White resigned.
[fen]3rr1k1/ppp2pp1/1b3q1p/8/6b1/2N2N2/PPQ1B1PP/R1B2K1R w - - 0 16[/fen]
I cannot see a trick shot yet though all the exchange and piece sacs
appear to nearly work so White is in no man's land.
Is there a threat or is this one of them, it's you move ...[text shortened]... ick.
You have to get it messy.
If it's lost, it's lost but go down with guns blazing.
Originally posted by Mariska AngelaVery nice, but in neither of the two variations explain why white resigns (I prefer white in both). Any explanation for white's resignation?
[fen]3rr1k1/ppp2pp1/1b3q1p/8/6b1/2N2N2/PPQ1B1PP/R1B2K1R[/fen]
16. h4 Qd6
The threat is 17... Qg3.
17. Bd2 Bxf3
18. gxf3 Qxd2
19. Qxd2 Rxd2
[fen]4r1k1/ppp2pp1/1b5p/8/7P/2N2P2/PP1rB3/R4K1R[/fen]
You can argue its only two pawns but after 20. Bd4 itll be three and black is pulling ahead.
16. Bd2
16... Bxf3
is could worth it but ...[text shortened]... rpetual earlier and get the game over with. A perpetual draw does mean white has no lead, ye? ๐
Originally posted by Mephisto2Thanks..
Very nice, but in neither of the two variations explain why white resigns (I prefer white in both). Any explanation for white's resignation?
edit: I never played in the 'ladder' thing, that's why I didn't consider the option of black playing for a draw. Is that really you? ๐
Originally posted by Mariska AngelaYour explanation is clear to me now, I just wondered why the white player thought it was enough to resign. He could have offered draw. Or do 'ladder' games not affect rating? My bad if they do ๐
Thanks..
What do you expect? It's the first dozen moves and these variations were deep and concrete. Do you want it to be five pages long and fifty moves deep? ๐ I replied the draw to the white should be better part. It's an easy perpetual, proves that white is not better. If you want to fight I say the compensation is more than enough for black, if you don't think so you could give a reason why as well.๐
Originally posted by Mariska AngelaYeah - this is the big question. White doesn't appear to be losing. I'm not sure why white would resign in this position. Maybe he saw a ghost?
The game could've been nice yes. I don't like losing but I was sure I'll at least draw no matter what, so I didnt stress it. I was actually enjoying the game
I still dont know why big Z resigned. ๐๐
Originally posted by greenpawn34I've been a swindler for a long time. Its part of the reason I responded to the original post (other than I like the Bishops Gambit). White messed up the opening, but righted himself enough to get decent chances. Part of chess is making the most of these opportunities. Maybe its not good enough (f5 puts a stop to most of the fun around Ne4, with or without Qg3), but you've got to give your opponents as many chances to mess up as possible. Sometimes he misses something.
Yes indeed Nf6+ too. That's 5 threats. He's doomed.
See that Erekose, one post and you now are now a master swindler.