Originally posted by clivestraddle6,000 moves in 15 days.
Which do you prefer? and against which opponents (higher rated and lower rated.
I generally like to keep the game open against "weaker" opponents and closed openings against higher rated. I strive to steer the game into high about amount of tactics against lower rated players and strive to use complex positions against higher rated - I find that a ...[text shortened]... off - against a lower rated player I let them have all the "rope" they need.
Thoughts?
How do you have time to even think about the type of game that you're playing?
Originally posted by clivestraddleSame here, but I usually play the same openings regardless of my opponent's strength. I'm obviously going to want to play an open, tactical game against a player with weaker tactical ability than me.
Which do you prefer? and against which opponents (higher rated and lower rated.
I generally like to keep the game open against "weaker" opponents and closed openings against higher rated. I strive to steer the game into high about amount of tactics against lower rated players and strive to use complex positions against higher rated - I find that a ...[text shortened]... off - against a lower rated player I let them have all the "rope" they need.
Thoughts?
Originally posted by clivestraddleFine.
Which do you prefer? and against which opponents (higher rated and lower rated.
I generally like to keep the game open against "weaker" opponents and closed openings against higher rated. I strive to steer the game into high about amount of tactics against lower rated players and strive to use complex positions against higher rated - I find that a ...[text shortened]... off - against a lower rated player I let them have all the "rope" they need.
Thoughts?
Now go read Logical Chess Move by Move. Even though you're 2200 on this site I'm certain that you'll benefit greatly for it in your OTB games 😉
- Joined
- 28 Apr 08
- Moves
- 77310
Originally posted by clivestraddleWell, being a lower rated player and having my rear handed to me by you recently, my thoughts right now are pretty much about how I hate you 😉
Which do you prefer? and against which opponents (higher rated and lower rated.
I generally like to keep the game open against "weaker" opponents and closed openings against higher rated. I strive to steer the game into high about amount of tactics against lower rated players and strive to use complex positions against higher rated - I find that a ...[text shortened]... off - against a lower rated player I let them have all the "rope" they need.
Thoughts?
1 edit
Originally posted by petrovitchI don't know, I've usually found it even easier to get a quick advantage against LRP (< 1500) in open positions. However, grinding them down in a closed position is safer even if longer. The problem is at the 1900+ level where they know how to handle closed positions fairly well and it's hard to squeeze a win. It doesn't help that they're higher rated than me. :p In more open positions with opposite castling, it's much more speculative and difficult to evaluate so I find winning much easier even against strong opposition.
It's not that simple. Paul Morphy was a genius at playing open positions, but played at a much lower level in closed positions. Of course, a lot has changed in theory since then, but my point is that it depends a lot on style of play, personality, and zeitgeist.
In general I would say that lower rated players are not capable of playing closed posit ics, culture, and technology change. The development of chess ideas is all about zeitgeist.
*This is OTB
- Joined
- 30 Dec 07
- Moves
- 9905
Originally posted by SquelchbelchUm... that makes no sense. I think that you must have added an extra number somewhere.
10111001001001010011000111000100100010100
01100101010101010101010100110101010101101
11011010101010100101100101010100101000101
00101110101110110101001010110101110110101
10101010010011010011001001010000100010010
11010100101010101010010101001010101001011
01001101 01100001 01111001 01100010 01100101 00100000 01111001 01101111 01110101 00100000 01110011 01101000 01101111 01110111 01101100 01100100 00100000 01101100 01100101 01100001 01110010 01101110 00100000 01100010 01101001 01101110 01100001 01110010 01111001 00101110 00100000 01001001 01110100 00100000 01101001 01110011 00100000 01100001 01100011 01110100 01110111 01100001 01101100 01101100 01111001 00100000 01101101 01101111 01110010 01100101 00100000 01100110 01110111 01101110 00100000 01110101 01101000 01100101 01101110 00100000 01111001 01101111 01110111 00100000 01101011 01101110 01101111 01110101 00100000 01101000 01101111 01110101 00101110
I wished to reply to this message when I first saw it, but I was unable to do so due to forum posting rules. But now I can! Only what I was going to say has already been said by others. For the most part. So I'll merely add:
Good riddance to bad rubbish.
I wonder if his poker playing companions are aware of his chesscapades?
Originally posted by Best101I disagree with you on this. Open games tend to have much more in the way of tactics whereas closed games tend towards slow manouvering.
I'm at my best in closed position, where tactics tend to be more of a focus.
In the latter I can get frustrated and go for things that are not there, losing so I always try the former if possible.