Go back
% of draws vs rating

% of draws vs rating

Only Chess

p

Joined
07 Nov 07
Moves
20949
Clock
30 May 09
Vote Up
Vote Down

I wonder whether there is a graph of this somewhere showing games played by players at different ratings and the % of outcomes that are draws. I'd be interested in seeing that.

w
If Theres Hell Below

We're All Gonna Go!

Joined
10 Sep 05
Moves
10228
Clock
30 May 09
Vote Up
Vote Down

it depends on horoscopes.

if your star sign is the leko or a kramnik, you draw. if your sign is the topalov or the tal, drawing is not your destiny.

cg

Seattle

Joined
30 Jan 06
Moves
26370
Clock
30 May 09
Vote Up
Vote Down

I know personally, drawing has always been a rare thing (I think it's like 18 out of 403 games)

J

Joined
03 Nov 08
Moves
15420
Clock
30 May 09
Vote Up
Vote Down

For the 1400+ database = 10.6%

For the 1900+ database = 27.2%

For the master's games database = 41.7%

b

lazy boy derivative

Joined
11 Mar 06
Moves
71817
Clock
30 May 09
Vote Up
Vote Down

Who cares, chess sucks

pp

Joined
30 May 09
Moves
0
Clock
30 May 09
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by patzer2007
I wonder whether there is a graph of this somewhere showing games played by players at different ratings and the % of outcomes that are draws. I'd be interested in seeing that.
I'm pretty sure there would be a strong correlation between the two. the stronger one gets, the more respect he has for the opponent, and the more accurately he assesses his winning chances in positions.

S

Joined
14 Jul 06
Moves
20541
Clock
30 May 09
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by philidor position
I'm pretty sure there would be a strong correlation between the two. the stronger one gets, the more respect he has for the opponent, and the more accurately he assesses his winning chances in positions.
Depends on style of play/opening selection as well though.

C

Joined
14 May 09
Moves
974
Clock
30 May 09
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by wormwood
it depends on horoscopes.

if your star sign is the leko or a kramnik, you draw. if your sign is the topalov or the tal, drawing is not your destiny.
You must be kidding a wee bit must you? I'm glad you moved from crack mountain, it was difficult to make sense of your incoherent babbles. This reply shows that, that stuff takes a wee bit of time to get out of your system.

MR

Joined
19 Jun 06
Moves
847
Clock
30 May 09
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by patzer2007
I wonder whether there is a graph of this somewhere showing games played by players at different ratings and the % of outcomes that are draws. I'd be interested in seeing that.
Only USCF ratings for 1997, but maybe this link will hold your interest. 🙂

http://math.bu.edu/people/mg/ratings/Draws.jpg

w
If Theres Hell Below

We're All Gonna Go!

Joined
10 Sep 05
Moves
10228
Clock
30 May 09
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Jasen777
For the 1400+ database = 10.6%

For the 1900+ database = 27.2%

For the master's games database = 41.7%
my drawing percentage was 4.7% at 1600. at 2000 it's 5.0%.

not much change there.

I think it's much more about how much of a risk taker a player is, than how strong you are.

pp

Joined
30 May 09
Moves
0
Clock
30 May 09
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by wormwood
my drawing percentage was 4.7% at 1600. at 2000 it's 5.0%.

not much change there.

I think it's much more about how much of a risk taker a player is, than how strong you are.
that is of course the most important factor for individuals. but in general, I would expect the average percentage get higher in large groups, especially on the way to grandmaster strength. .

duecer
anybody seen my

underpants??

Joined
01 Sep 06
Moves
56453
Clock
30 May 09
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

I am at 5.75%. I don't get a lot of draw offers, and I play most games to the end in hopes of a stalemate like this one: Game 6058263

w
If Theres Hell Below

We're All Gonna Go!

Joined
10 Sep 05
Moves
10228
Clock
30 May 09
2 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by philidor position
that is of course the most important factor for individuals. but in general, I would expect the average percentage get higher in large groups, especially on the way to grandmaster strength. .
actually, it's been shown that aggressive style scores (slightly) more points, on grandmaster level. it was studied a couple of years ago.



found it. well, a chessbase bit on it to be exact.

Embracing Risk in Tournaments:
http://www.chessbase.de/newsdetail.asp?newsid=3528

J

Joined
03 Nov 08
Moves
15420
Clock
30 May 09
Vote Up
Vote Down

I think better players are less likely to make blunders, thus causing more draws. At least on the amateur level.

S

Dublin

Joined
07 Feb 05
Moves
8227
Clock
30 May 09
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by wormwood
actually, it's been shown that aggressive style scores (slightly) more points, on grandmaster level. it was studied a couple of years ago.



found it. well, a chessbase bit on it to be exact.

Embracing Risk in Tournaments:
http://www.chessbase.de/newsdetail.asp?newsid=3528
That link just says that more aggressive players win more tournaments than players who draw more often, which is pretty obvious. It doesn't say they get better scores overall.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.