1. Standard memberRJHinds
    The Near Genius
    Fort Gordon
    Joined
    24 Jan '11
    Moves
    13644
    01 Dec '12 04:42
    Originally posted by Grobzilla
    I knew you numbnuts wouldn't understand. 😏
  2. Joined
    16 Nov '07
    Moves
    2329
    01 Dec '12 04:54
  3. Joined
    23 Nov '09
    Moves
    136361
    01 Dec '12 09:48
  4. Wat?
    Joined
    16 Aug '05
    Moves
    76863
    01 Dec '12 11:21
    Originally posted by RJHinds
    GameId "8895566" Game 8895566
    RJHinds vs Pawnb4dawn

    The above game is another example of winning against a strong chess player with psychology. But you guys will not understand it, because you refuse to learn about chess psychology.
    YOU NEED to learn about basic human psychology first, and how much you expose yourself in trying to ascertain the little you actually know about psychology.

    If you want proof that I study a Masters MSc in pyschology PM me. I'll happily display proof to you!

    You're becoming more of an exposed dim-wit, and cheat the more you talk, and you can't even recognise that, within your own writing. From my perespective, that must be very scary for you. But you've created the lie, and will do everything you can, now that you are trying to live it, to make it more and more real for every body else, even when they can see through you, but you won't admit it. I wonder how far you will go?

    -m.
  5. Standard memberProper Knob
    Cornovii
    North of the Tamar
    Joined
    02 Feb '07
    Moves
    53689
    01 Dec '12 11:26
    Originally posted by RJHinds
    GameId "8895566" Game 8895566
    RJHinds vs Pawnb4dawn

    The above game is another example of winning against a strong chess player with psychology. But you guys will not understand it, because you refuse to learn about chess psychology.
    No it's not, it has nothing to do with psychology. That guy resigned about 30 games on the 26th December last year stating he didn't have enough time due to family commitments, and that game happened to be one of them.
  6. Standard memberRJHinds
    The Near Genius
    Fort Gordon
    Joined
    24 Jan '11
    Moves
    13644
    01 Dec '12 15:30
    Originally posted by mikelom
    YOU NEED to learn about basic human psychology first, and how much you expose yourself in trying to ascertain the little you actually know about psychology.

    If you want proof that I study a Masters MSc in pyschology PM me. I'll happily display proof to you!

    You're becoming more of an exposed dim-wit, and cheat the more you talk, and you can't even reco ...[text shortened]... when they can see through you, but you won't admit it. I wonder how far you will go?

    -m.
    Keep on wondering, wonderboy. 😏
  7. Standard memberRJHinds
    The Near Genius
    Fort Gordon
    Joined
    24 Jan '11
    Moves
    13644
    01 Dec '12 15:31
    Originally posted by Proper Knob
    No it's not, it has nothing to do with psychology. That guy resigned about 30 games on the 26th December last year stating he didn't have enough time due to family commitments, and that game happened to be one of them.
    He must have been playing you at the time. 😏
  8. Joined
    16 Nov '07
    Moves
    2329
    01 Dec '12 16:25
  9. Joined
    23 Nov '09
    Moves
    136361
    01 Dec '12 18:57
  10. Joined
    31 Mar '12
    Moves
    3134
    01 Dec '12 23:13

    This post is unavailable.

    Please refer to our posting guidelines.

  11. Joined
    31 Mar '12
    Moves
    3134
    01 Dec '12 23:15

    This post is unavailable.

    Please refer to our posting guidelines.

  12. SubscriberPaul Leggett
    Chess Librarian
    The Stacks
    Joined
    21 Aug '09
    Moves
    113550
    02 Dec '12 00:16
    Originally posted by Proper Knob
    No it's not, it has nothing to do with psychology. That guy resigned about 30 games on the 26th December last year stating he didn't have enough time due to family commitments, and that game happened to be one of them.
    Ouch. This means RJHinds has been caught in a blatant, documented lie. When placed in the context of his asserted religious beliefs, it is very sad.
  13. Joined
    26 Aug '11
    Moves
    10242
    02 Dec '12 02:2012 edits
    Okay, Let's talk about RHP Rating Strength of a Player, because that's what you've been
    focusing anyway...
    This Question is for you Proper Knob
    Since you sarcastically remarked me on this thread at Page 2 / Post #12
    "I Quote," ... (" Riiiiiiiight." 😞 _ Proper Knob )
    and "Paulbuchmanfromfics" on this another sarcastic remark, "I Quote, "
    "Take my word on 4. ... Bf5, I'm 3200 OTB". 😉 - Paulbuchmanfromfics
    Thread 149964 Page#1 / Post #7
    then here is my question to both of you...

    What RHP rating strength range of a Player should white be,
    to have a chance to draw this game, if it's possible,
    and What RHP rating strength range of a Player should black be, to win perfectly.
    on this example here??

    Remember, We are talking a difference of over 600 points here...

    Black to move..
    Can White still save the game or not and Why?

    Game 9244916
    Jcmessy (1663) vs. Fred Aborn (2286)
  14. Standard memberRJHinds
    The Near Genius
    Fort Gordon
    Joined
    24 Jan '11
    Moves
    13644
    02 Dec '12 03:33
    Originally posted by Paul Leggett
    Ouch. This means RJHinds has been caught in a blatant, documented lie. When placed in the context of his asserted religious beliefs, it is very sad.
    I knew you numbnuts wouldn't understand. 😏
  15. Standard memberChessPraxis
    Cowboy From Hell
    American West
    Joined
    19 Apr '10
    Moves
    55013
    02 Dec '12 03:37
Back to Top

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.I Agree