1. Joined
    25 Jun '05
    Moves
    44884
    18 Nov '05 19:16
    which is better defence for a queens gambit?
    queens gambit declined or sicillian defence.πŸ™‚
  2. Standard memberSanta Drummer
    I AM INNOCENT
    Account suspended
    Joined
    01 Nov '05
    Moves
    3130
    18 Nov '05 19:17
    OH YES SICILIAN IS TEH 1337 AGAINST D4!!
  3. Joined
    15 Aug '05
    Moves
    96595
    18 Nov '05 19:27

    This post is unavailable.

    Please refer to our posting guidelines.

  4. Joined
    15 Aug '05
    Moves
    96595
    18 Nov '05 19:29

    This post is unavailable.

    Please refer to our posting guidelines.

  5. Joined
    25 Jun '05
    Moves
    44884
    18 Nov '05 19:49
    Originally posted by Sicilian Smaug
    what's TEH 1337?
    TEH = THE
  6. Standard memberSanta Drummer
    I AM INNOCENT
    Account suspended
    Joined
    01 Nov '05
    Moves
    3130
    18 Nov '05 19:55
    1337 = leet = ELITE BESTEST!!!
  7. Standard memberark13
    Enola Straight
    mouse mouse mouse
    Joined
    16 Jan '05
    Moves
    12804
    18 Nov '05 20:13
    Originally posted by Sicilian Smaug
    um..well... er.. no commentπŸ˜•
    You could play for a transposition but it's unlikely to happen.
  8. Joined
    23 Jul '05
    Moves
    8869
    18 Nov '05 20:13
    Originally posted by vuelve
    which is better defence for a queens gambit?
    queens gambit declined or sicillian defence.πŸ™‚
    To make things clear
    Queen's gambit = 1. d4 d5 2. c4
    The queen's gambit declined is the recomended responce
    and continues 2. e6

    There is also the queen's gambit accepted - this isn't very good because it is very difficult to keep the pawn against a good player.
    I wouldn't recommend this but it follows 2. dxc4

    Another move is the slav defence, this follows 2. c6
  9. Behind You!
    Joined
    14 Oct '05
    Moves
    78
    18 Nov '05 22:18
    I think the Chubaka defence is the best.
  10. Joined
    25 May '05
    Moves
    562
    19 Nov '05 08:21
    Originally posted by Bad wolf

    There is also the queen's gambit accepted - this isn't very good because it is very difficult to keep the pawn against a good player.


    nothing wrong with the QGA, perfectly playable and has been played by kasparov, Anand,Kortschnoj, Baburin, Ibragimov, Ivanchuk, Hübner, Lautier, Yakovich, etc. It's completely sound.
  11. Joined
    30 Aug '05
    Moves
    4802
    19 Nov '05 08:52
    I prefere queen gambit decline e5 ... d5 ... e4 look at this game: Game 1538154
  12. Joined
    30 Aug '05
    Moves
    4802
    19 Nov '05 09:59
    Just ignore my last post I thought you were talking about kings gambit ... 😡

    For me the best agenst queens oppening is the indian
  13. Joined
    15 Aug '05
    Moves
    96595
    19 Nov '05 11:30

    This post is unavailable.

    Please refer to our posting guidelines.

  14. Joined
    23 Jul '05
    Moves
    8869
    19 Nov '05 12:31
    Originally posted by Sicilian Smaug
    QGA is fine as long as you dont try and hang on to the pawn.
    The problems start with QGA when the opponent tries to keep the pawn. It is fine I suppose, if you black lets white recapture.
  15. Standard memberDeepThought
    Losing the Thread
    Quarantined World
    Joined
    27 Oct '04
    Moves
    87415
    19 Nov '05 12:43
    Originally posted by vuelve
    which is better defence for a queens gambit?
    queens gambit declined or sicillian defence.πŸ™‚
    Do you mean the Dutch (1. d4 f5) ?
Back to Top

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.I Agree