Originally posted by kmac27
So I want to know from the people 1700 and above what your rating is and how many moves you think ahead when in the middle game, average, minimum and maximum.
My rating on RHP just inched above 1900 again this week (I'm probably about 2000 in a USCF format). Regarding your question: How many moves ahead do I calculate? In one sense, this is a pretty easy question: I don't think about calculating moves ahead unless I'm calculating a combination. Consequently I don't calculate a combination unless someone has disrupted the equilibrium.
I generally don't think of playing chess in terms of calculating. More important is evaluating your position vs. your opponent's position. After you've determined if you or your opponent has the initiative, you have to figure out where the best posting of your pieces would be, then you have to be able to properly assess their static and dynamic weaknesses and formulate a plan that comports with the position on the board. This all has to be weighed in conjunction with what your opponent is doing. If neither side has disrupted the equilibrium, then you just have to continue maneuvering to gain an advantage in position. In the endgame, you have to know if you're playing for the win, defending against a loss or playing for a draw. This determines the posting of the pieces and the character of your plan. Sometimes, your opponent plays a bad move or even a surprise move that you hadn't calculated and the game ends differently you'd presumed. Sometimes the position is so original or illogical or tactical that one has to rely on intuition instead of calculation. That's why we all keep coming back: The game is inexhaustible.
Back to the original question: I can probably play six moves ahead without aid of a board. Studying Pawn endings without a board is a great way to learn how to calculate. If you can see three moves ahead, that generally is enough to play a creditable game. If you want to get better at calculating, blindfold chess is probably the best way to improve your skills. I once read that Botvinnik played a lot of checkers and Lasker played a lot of the Japanese game Go to improve their calculating skills. There is no magic bullet, you just have to do a lot of studying.