Originally posted by BigDoggProblem
Give one example of where g4 in a mutual Kside castling situation is called a 'bayonet' by someone other than yourself.
Yes, I do tend to come off as 'uppity' to insincere, dishonest people spoiling for a fight under a guise of 'asking for analysis and helpful suggestions'. Especially when they cannot give good reasons for rejecting the analysis. Your inability to deal with that is your problem.
Wow. The only one ever spoiling for a fight was you. I was the one who posted the game with a clear intention of where I wanted advice. Which should have been obvious by my annotations where I said, "I didn't know what to do here." I never asked where my mistakes were, I pointed out where I thought I was wrong after the fact and showed where I didn't know what do... it was all in my annotations.
I have never had any problems with any other person ever asking for advice like this until you.
"I had to play ...f6 to protect my e pawn.
Maybe my wording was unclear but I wasn't afraid of white moving his bishop to e6, I wanted to move my knight there without him having the opportunity to trade it.
I will take your advice into consideration, however I had thought about the possible weakness of the kingside during the game but that is the problem any time you gain space, if it isn't maintained it becomes weak squares, but isn't the weakness not very easy to target because of the closed center? Even so, it wasn't really a headache, his queen maneuver was just an easily defended threat.
I know where my decisive mistakes were, even the ones white failed to capitalize on. My main concern is what should I have been aiming for coming out of the opening? I played ...d4 early on and I don't think that is correct along with my ...a5 move but these types of moves were results of not having any knowledge of the structure I was dealing with.
If I were playing a better player, he would have played for f4 when I have no idea what I should be playing for, maybe the prevention of f4? but then I am just defending and relying on a mistake by white to win the game"
That was my original response to you. Not picking a fight, simply discussing chess and clarifying what I wanted help with
"Protect it from what? Nothing was attacking it.
And asking people for advice, followed by telling them, "thanks, but I already know where my mistakes are" is strange behavior. Perhaps you don't really want to know where your mistakes were.
It's easy to focus on the tactical part of the game, later on, where you see you had a better defensive move, and call that the 'mistake'. But why put yourself in a situation where you must find precise moves just to preserve your advantage at best, and avoid losing at worst?"
And that was your response. You never showed me anything, you just said some moves were bad that are shown to be not bad. Now you are trying to say that it is only a bad move for lower rated players.
You were the one who picked the fight, not me.