Originally posted by Talisman
...Jonathan Rowson sums it up in his brilliant Chess for Zebras by emphasising the difference between knowledge picked up from writers such as silman and Skill on the chessboard. One for whatever reason doesn't seem to enhance the other. It's a very inetersting debate and i'd urge you to pick up a copy of CFZ for more on the subject.
Says Rowson (pg. 25):
Most players seek to increase their knowledge by learning new positions, and tend to study by “reading and nodding” as Nigel Davies put it. What they should be doing more often is honing their skills, however meager, by forcing themselves to think through training and practice.
And on page 28:
Chess skill emerges from chess playing combined with chess training, where ‘training’ means working things out by yourself. The main skill a chess-player needs is skill in making decisions, so that’s what you need to do and do repeatedly. If you want to become a better player, you need better habits, and you cultivate better habits through training. The best training is the kind that pushes you up against the edges of your comfort zone, where you force yourself to take responsibility for difficult decisions. It is so much easier to read books that give strategic guidelines, hints and tips, etc., but what you need is ‘know how’ and that means learning by doing.
There you are, then. Save yourself $29.95 (for Rowson's book) and simply DO IT YOURSELF.